KULeuven
Bruges, West, 8200, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT07367802
General Aim: to explore the iKA in TKA related to clinical, biomechanical, and functional outcomes.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me55 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bruges, West, 8200, Belgium
First specific aim: to investigate the kinematics during daily functional movements in individuals with the iKA TKA to those with aMA TKA, as well as the healthy control group.
Second specific aim: to investigate kinetics and muscle activation patterns during functional movements in individuals with the iKA aligned TKA to those with aMA TKA, as well as a healthy control group.
Third specific aim: to investigate the impact of the whole body on functional outcomes following iKA and aMA TKA, in comparison to the healthy control group, and to explore the underlying factors contributing to suboptimal outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
were age under 85 years. primary robot-assisted TKA using either iKA or aMA. surgery performed two years before enrollment. independent ambulation without assistive devices; and informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
history of lower limb trauma or fracture. neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis). systemic musculoskeletal diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathy).
revision arthroplasty. and cognitive impairment affecting study participation.
This study compared inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) TKA, which preserves native JLO, with adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) TKA, which standardizes JLO to 90°, and a healthy control group across eight functional activities.
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Stadiometer; height in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Vicon Nexus 2.12 software (©Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK); Unit: Degrees
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
year
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Direct Tape Measure; Leg Length in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Inter-ASIS Dist in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Knee Width in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Ankle Width in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Elbow Width in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Wrist Width in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vernier caliper, Hand Thickness in millimeters
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Vicon Nexus 2.12 software (©Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK); Unit in second
Time frame: Pre-TKA, 6 weeks after TKA, 2 years after TKA
Pain Scores
Time frame: Pre-TKA; 2 years after TKA
total score ranging from 0 to 48
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
Peak force measured with a hand-held dynamometer (Micro FET 2 Handheld Dynamometer, Hoggan, USA); Unit: Newtons
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
A 16-channel telemetric wireless surface electromyography (EMG) system (Waveplus®, Cometa, Rome, Italy) operating at 1000 Hz was utilized. Unit: Volt
Time frame: 2 years after TKA
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2
KU Leuven
Other
Acronym: iKA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07682909
Arthroplasty, Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee
View Trial DetailsNCT06969222
Arthroplasty Complications, Knee Arthropathy
Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
View Trial Details