Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06460077

Exploring Pathology Related to Slowly Expanding Lesions Using Advanced Imaging

This is an open, follow-up study to compare the performance of three critical imaging methods to detect chronic active lesions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in vivo.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Turku PET Centre

Turku, Southwest Finland, 20520, Finland

About this study

Smoldering inflammation is recognized as a critical contributor to MS progression-related central nervous system (CNS) damage. Activated microglia and macrophages particularly at chronic lesion edge are believed to promote lesion growth. Reversing their harmful activity may prove to be an efficient way to halt progression independent of relapses in MS.

These smoldering, or chronic active lesions can be detected in vivo using advanced imaging techniques. 1) Specific algorithms can be used to identify lesion growth, with a hypothesis that the slowly evolving lesions (SEL) are the ones harboring a rim of activated microglial cells, which contribute to damage in the surrounding tissue, and lesion growth. 2) Lesions partially or entirely surrounded by rims of increased tissue intensity on QSM-MRI (quantitative susceptibility mapping) sequences are considered as iron rim lesions, with iron-containing proinflammatory microglia/macrophages at the lesion edge. 3) In addition, 18 kDa translocator protein-positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging can be used to identify chronic active lesions based on TSPO-expression by activated innate immune cells, and their gathering at the edges of chronic active lesions. The TSPO-PET analysis of chronic active lesions can be semi-automated, and the specific radioligand binding at the chronic active lesion edge can be quantitated, which enhances the sensitivity of this method.

Despite existing preliminary data demonstrating increased QSM signal TSPO-positive lesions, it is yet to be demonstrated how these three imaging methods perform in identifying chronic active lesions when compared to each other at larger scale.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signing the informed consent form
  • MS diagnosis in accordance with McDonald 2017 criteria
  • Available longitudinal brain MR images (minimum 1 year)
  • Simultaneous QSM MRI sequence and TSPO-PET
  • Lesions with iron rim/s

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with other neurodegenerative disease than MS
  • Patients with other autoimmune disease than MS
  • Patients with other significant or malignant underlying disease of any other organ system
  • Patients that are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Corticosteroid treatment within 4 weeks of imaging
  • Patients with significant abnormal findings other than MS in the screening MRI
  • Patients with claustrophobia, or a history of moderate to severe anxiety disorder or panic attacks (which could potentially lead to preterm termination of the imaging)
  • Contraindication to PET scan investigations
  • Exposure to experimental radiation in the past 12 months such that radiodosimetry limits would be exceeded by participating in this study
  • Intolerance to previous PET scans; i.e. previous hypersensitivity reactions to any PET ligand or imaging agent or failure to participate in and comply with previous PET scans

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of lesions

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    The number of lesions identified using each respective method

  2. Co-localization of lesions

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    Potential co-localization of the RIM+ lesions identified using the various methods.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of PET imaging and clinical variables

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    Imaging variables from PET imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.

  2. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    Imaging variables from MR imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.

  3. Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical variables

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.

  4. Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical variables

    Time frame: 18 months, 36 months

    Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Turku University Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Acronym: SELPET

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 14, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.