Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05123196

Exploratory Study of MT-8554 in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of MT-8554, compared to placebo, in subjects with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Yachiyo Hospital, Anjo, Aichi-ken, Japan

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with written consent
  • Patients aged >=20 years at the time of consent
  • Outpatients
  • Patients with pain associated with peripheral symmetric polyneuropathy due to diabetes mellitus and pain lasting >=3 months on the first day of the run-in period. The patient should meet >=2 of the following criteria or nerve conduction studies showing abnormalities in at least one test item (Conduction velocity, amplitude, and latency) for at least two nerves by the first day of run-in period.
  • 1. Subjective symptoms* thought to be due to diabetic polyneuropathy
  • 2. Decreased or eliminated bilateral Achilles tendon reflexes
  • 3. Bilateral decreased vibratory sense of the medial malleolus (=< 10 seconds with a C 128 tuning fork)

*Subjective symptoms thought to be due to diabetic neuropathy meet the following 3 criteria.

  • Bilateral
  • Toe and plantar symptoms (Numbness, pain or dysesthesia)
  • Does not cause upper extremity symptoms alone
  • Patients whose NRS during the run-in period is assessed for >=4 days of the 7 days immediately before the first day of the treatment period and whose baseline 24-hour mean NRS score is >=4 and =<8.
  • Patients whose rate of change in the 24-hour mean NRS score during the 7 days immediately before the first day of the treatment period is <30%.
  • Patients whose treatment for diabetes mellitus is consistent >=8 weeks before the run-in period, who can consistently maintain the treatment throughout the study period, and in whom the investigator (or sub-investigator) can determine that glycemic control is constant.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with pain, disease, or skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator (or sub-investigator), would influence the evaluation of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

For example, if other pain is in the same location as painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, or if the pain intensity of the other pain is greater than that of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, which in the opinion of the investigator (or sub-investigator) would impact the assessment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

  • Patients who have had amputation of upper and lower limbs other than toes due to gangrene caused by impaired blood circulation.
  • Patients who do not meet the criteria of prohibited concomitant drugs or restricted concomitant drugs.
  • Patients with hypersensitivity to acetaminophen or a history of hypersensitivity to acetaminophen.
  • Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms of heart failure.
  • History of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or cerebrovascular disorder (excluding lacunar infarction) within 6 months prior to informed consent.
  • Patients with major psychiatric disorder such as depression or anxiety disorder.
  • Patients with drug abuse or a history of drug abuse.
  • Patients with current or previous infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, patients with previous infection with hepatitis B virus who are HBsAg-negative are eligible.
  • Patients with HbA1c > 10.5%.
  • Patients with poorly controlled hypertension (>= 180 mmHg systolic and/or >= 110 mmHg diastolic).
  • Patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2.
  • Patients with AST or ALT > 2.5*ULN.
  • Patients who answered "Yes " to any item of Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale within the past 12 months.
  • Patients who have a concomitant malignancy or a history of malignancy. However, patients who have a history of malignancy but have not experienced recurrence for at least 5 years before informed consent (patients who have not experienced recurrence for at least 5 years after the last administration if the patients were receiving anticancer drugs) will be excluded.
  • Male or female patients of childbearing potential who do not agree to use contraception from the date of informed consent until 3 months after the completion (discontinuation) of investigational product.
  • Female patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding or possibly pregnant.
  • Patients who participated in another clinical study and received investigational product within 12 weeks before informed consent.
  • Prior exposure to MT-8554.
  • Other patients who, in the opinion of the investigator (or sub-investigator), are ineligible for this study.

Treatment and study plan

MT-8554

Drug

Oral Capsule

Other names: Elismetrep

Placebo

Drug

Oral Capsule

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the weekly mean 24-hour average NRS score at Week 12 in treatment period

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in weekly mean 24-hour average NRS score at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

  2. Average weekly 24-hour NRS score during the 12 week treatment period 30% and 50% responder rates

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

  3. Change from baseline in weekly mean daily NRS score at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

  4. Change from baseline in weekly mean nocturnal average NRS score at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

  5. Change from baseline in weekly mean 24 hour worst NRS score at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the 11-point numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NRS scores indicated worse outcome.

  6. Change from baseline in NPSI at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) is the questionnaire to evaluate the different symptoms of neuropathic pain and each symptoms are evaluated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher NPSI scores indicated worse outcome.

  7. Change from baseline in BPI pain severity at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is the questionnaire to assess the severity of pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as patient can imagine). Higher BPI scores indicated worse outcome.

  8. Change from baseline in BPI functional impairment at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is the questionnaire to assess the impact of pain on daily functions from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Higher BPI scores indicated worse outcome.

  9. Change from baseline in MOS-SS at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) is the questionnaire to evaluate the "sleep disorder " "snoring" "sleep arousal with shortness of breath or headache" "sleep sufficiency" "somnolence" and "amount of sleep/optimal sleep" ranges from 0 (all of the time) to 6 (none of the time). Lower MOS-SS scores indicated worse outcome.

  10. Proportion of PGIC responders at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire to evaluate the overall impression of pain improvement by patient from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher PGIC scores indicated worse outcome.

  11. Proportion of CGIC responder at each assessment point

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) a questionnaire to evaluate the overall impression of pain improvement by clinician from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher CGIC scores indicated worse outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tanabe Pharma Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Exploratory Study of MT-8554 in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Nov 17, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.