Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03869541
There is a need to know more about the safety of mobilizing intensive care unit (ICU) patients who are receiving vasoactive drugs that support the heart and blood pressure. But before this research can be done, several uncertainties need to be addressed.
To answer these uncertainties, the investigators will ask ICU patients receiving vasoactive drugs to take part in a study in three main stages. Firstly ICU patients will be asked whether they would be happy to take part in a future research trial on the safety of mobilizing patients who are receiving vasoactive drugs. Secondly, data will be collected about the current mobilization on vasoactive drugs that occurs. Finally, the investigators will try to follow up these patients 60 days after they start the study, to carry out some questionnaires and a walking test with the patients. These tests may be used in future research to measure the effect of mobilizing patients on vasoactive drugs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
London, United Kingdom
The current evidence is insufficient to accurately guide clinicians to know when it is safe to start mobilizing intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving vasoactive drugs. Before a randomized controlled trial can be designed, several uncertainties need to be addressed. This includes clarifying what standard care is, what potential recruitment rates would be and what the most suitable primary outcome measure is.
This study is an exploratory observational study which will aim to recruit up to 40 ICU patients receiving vasoactive drugs to further clarify standard care and to measure preliminary feasibility outcomes.
Upon enrolment, patients and clinicians will be surveyed about the hypothetical acceptability of recruitment into a future randomized controlled trial. Then any routine mobilization that occurs whilst the patient is receiving vasoactive drugs will be analyzed, for example, to describe how clinicians assessed safety for mobilization. Finally, patient participants will be followed up at day 60 to assess the feasibility of measuring candidate primary outcome measures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Patient participants:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinicians participating in a survey on hypothetical randomization of patient participants:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinician participants in the survey on the feasibility of the ICU physical rehabilitation adverse event tool:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Physical rehabilitation
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
The number of patient participants who would hypothetically accept being randomised into a future trial on the safety of mobilising patients receiving vasoactive drugs.
Time frame: 60 days
Patient participant follow-up rate at 60 days.
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Survey measuring participant acceptance of hypothetical randomisation scenarios: scenario 1: early versus no rehabilitation
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Survey measuring participant acceptance of hypothetical randomization scenarios: scenario 2: early rehabilitation versus standard care
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Survey measuring participant acceptance of hypothetical randomization scenarios: scenario 3: protocolised rehabilitation versus standard care
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Quantity of missing data resulting from measurement of participant pre-morbid co-morbidities.
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Quantity of missing data resulting from measurement of participant pre-morbid frailty.
Time frame: Baseline (approximately one day from enrolment)
Quantity of missing data resulting from measurement of participant pre-morbid physical function.
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Recorded whenever a physiotherapist reviews a patient participant for potential physical rehabilitation whilst they are receiving vasoactive drugs and the patient was mobilized.
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Recorded whenever a physiotherapist reviews a patient participant for potential physical rehabilitation whilst they are receiving vasoactive drugs and the patient was mobilized.
Qualitative measure: reasons underwent content analysis, with the outcome being the themes summarizing the reasons.
Time frame: Through duration of intensive care stay (average 7 days)
Recorded whenever a physiotherapist reviews a patient for potential physical rehabilitation whilst they are receiving vasoactive drugs and the patient was not mobilized.
Time frame: Through duration of intensive care stay (average 7 days)
Recorded whenever a physiotherapist reviews a patient for potential physical rehabilitation whilst they are receiving vasoactive drugs and the patient was not mobilized.
Qualitative variable: reasons underwent qualitative analysis, with the output of a list of themes summarizing the reasons.
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Recorded if a mobilisation treatment on vasoactive drugs is routinely carried out.
Time frame: Through whole of study, an estimated 6 months
Number of serious adverse events
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Recorded using ICU physical rehabilitation adverse event tool, both by treating clinician and by researcher case note review.
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Adverse event tool is completed if a mobilisation treatment on vasoactive drugs is routinely carried out.
Time frame: Through duration of ICU stay (average of 7 days).
Tool completed both by treating clinician and by researcher case note review. Number of mobilization treatment sessions on vasoactive drugs where adverse event tool is complete.
Time frame: Through second half of the study, an estimated 3 months
A survey measuring user opinion on whether an adverse event tool was for example understandable and an appropriate length using a scale with 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure' responses. Survey adapted from Hodgson, C., Needham, D., Haines, K., Bailey, M., Ward, A., Harrold, M., Young, P., Zanni, J., Buhr, H., Higgins, A., Presneill, J. & Berney, S. 2014. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU mobility scale. Heart Lung, 43.
Time frame: Through duration of hospital stay (average of 22 days)
Number of days to first rehabilitation treatment
Time frame: Through duration of hospital stay (average of 22 days)
Regardless of the assistance required.
Time frame: Through duration of hospital stay (average of 22 days).
Regardless of the assistance required.
Time frame: Through duration of hospital stay (average of 22 days).
Regardless of assistance required.
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge (an average of 7 days)
Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (average of 22 days)
Time frame: ICU discharge (an average of 7 days from ICU admission)
Intensive care unit mobility scale records a patient's mobility level from 0 to 10, where 0 means no mobility and 10 means walking without assistance from people or a physical aid.
Time frame: 60 days.
Candidate primary outcomes: mortality, health-related quality of life, disability, physical functioning questionnaire and walking test.
Time frame: 60 days.
Candidate primary outcomes: mortality, health-related quality of life, disability, physical functioning questionnaire and walking test.
Time frame: 60 days.
Measures of central tendency and variability of data for candidate outcome measures to inform a sample size for future randomised controlled trial, e.g. physical functioning measured by the physical function domain of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 Questionnaire (RAND SF-36 v1), scores range from 0-100, where a higher score means better physical functioning.
Imperial College London
Other
Investigating the Safety of Mobilising Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Vasoactive Drugs: An Exploratory Observational Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04612348
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07020637
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07579728
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details