Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01525121

Expiratory Rib Cage Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

This is a randomized crossover study, designed to evaluate if the manual expiratory rib cage compression technique improves respiratory mechanics and is effective in secretion removal in mechanically ventilated patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Rio de Janeiro, 21041-010, Brazil

About this study

Chest physiotherapy is an essential component of the multidisciplinary approach in critical care settings. In this context, a number of devices and manual techniques have been used to remove pulmonary secretions and re-expand collapsed areas. This study was designed to evaluate whether manual rib cage compression improves airway clearance and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. In a randomized crossover trial, 20 mechanically ventilated patients underwent thoracic manual compression and control intervention (normal ventilation) at the same day. The main outcomes were sputum production and the changes in respiratory mechanics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients under mechanical ventilation
  • diagnosis of pulmonary infection
  • hypersecretive (defined as the interval between tracheal suctioning < 2 hours)

Exclusion criteria

  • haemodynamic instability (defined by heart rate > 130 bpm and mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg)
  • use of vasopressor drugs
  • absence of respiratory drive
  • acute bronchospasm
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • atelectasis (identified by an independent radiologist that was not participating in the study)
  • untreated pneumothorax
  • lung haemorrhage.

Treatment and study plan

expiratory rib cage compression

Other

The therapist hands were positioned on the lower ribs, and the force was applied every two breaths only during the expiration, synchronizing the maneuver rate with the patient's respiratory rate. Then, the patients underwent a suctioning procedure, and a hyperinflation maneuver consisting of a 10 minutes period under pressure support ventilation of 35 cmH2O was done. In control intervention instead of the compressive maneuver the patients were kept on normal ventilation.

Other names: Manual thoracic compression

Primary outcomes

  1. Sputum Volume (mL)

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory Mechanics

    Time frame: Day 1

    Static and effective compliance of the respiratory system Total resistance of the respiratory system

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Expiratory Rib Cage Compression Does Not Improve Secretion Clearance and Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Feb 2, 2012
Registry last updated
Feb 2, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.