Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06675409

Expert Guided Training Versus Self Learning with Virtual Patients

Virtual patients have increasingly been used in the training of healthcare professionals to enhance critical decision-making skills in emergency patient management education. The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of the virtual patient simulation used in the education of paramedic students by comparing the effectiveness of self-directed learning with expert-guided learning. Additionally, it is believed that the study will be beneficial for educators responsible for program design who are interested in integrating the case-based learning method with virtual patients into their curriculum.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year–21 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University CASE Simulation Center

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Virtual patient-based simulation training is increasingly being used in healthcare and medical education to enhance problem-solving and critical decision-making skills. There are two common approaches in these trainings: instructor-led learning and self-directed learning. In instructor-led virtual patient-based simulation training programs, an experienced subject matter expert guides students through virtual patient simulation activities. The instructor provides feedback, support, and encourages discussion and collaboration among students during the training. This approach is beneficial for students who benefit from structured activities and social support in a group learning environment. However, it can be time-consuming, costly, and may not be suitable for every student.

In self-directed learning, the responsibility for learning lies entirely with the student. Students are given access to virtual patient simulations and are encouraged to work through the cases independently. This approach may be more suitable for students who are self-motivated, enjoy autonomy, and have the discipline to work independently. It also offers a cost-effective and flexible option. However, in this approach, the feedback and support needed for skill development are limited to the feedback reports generated by the computer-based virtual patient software program.

In the literature, studies on the use of virtual patient applications in paramedic students' emergency patient management training are limited. This study aims to contribute to educators who use or plan to use virtual patient simulation by comparing instructor-led virtual patient-based simulation training with self-directed virtual patient-based simulation training to determine which approach is more effective in enhancing students' critical decision-making skills.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Volunteer 4th-semester paramedic students from the Department of Vocational Health Sciences at the University

Exclusion criteria

Previous experience with the same clinical scenarios

Treatment and study plan

Education

Other

The effectiveness of two different training methods with virtual patients for improving the critical decision-making skills of paramedic students will be compared between two groups: one receiving expert-guided training and the other following a self-directed approach

Primary outcomes

  1. Virtual patient exam scores of the participants

    Time frame: 1 week

    All the participants will attend to the virtual patient exam and the scores will be compared between groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Expert Guided Training and Self -Directed Learning with Virtual Patients in Emergency Management Training : a Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Nov 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.