NaF/ KNO3/isopentane Dentifrice
DrugExperimental toothpaste
NCT Number: NCT00752089
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an experimental fluoridated dentifrice is effective in the treatment of dental caries
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–78 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Topical fluorides have been proven to be clinically effective in the prevention of dental caries. It is generally agreed that anti-caries effect of fluoride (F) is mainly by decreasing the rate of enamel demineralization and enhancing the rate of enamel remineralization. An in-situ Surface Micro-hardness (SMH) test is widely used to evaluate enamel demineralization and remineralization during the caries process. Determination of fluoride uptake in-situ also provides better estimation of true fluoride bioavailability of fluoride dentifrice products. In this study, an in-situ remineralization fluoride uptake model will be used to compare the efficacy of experimental dentifrice with a marketed dentifrice and placebo dentifrice. Participants wore partial dentures containing two partially demineralized enamel specimens for two weeks- 24 hours per day, except when brushing (twice daily) with test dentifrice. Following each treatment period, the enamel specimens were analyzed for SMH recovery and fluoride uptake through microdrill enamel biopsy technique.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experimental toothpaste
Experimental toothpaste
Active comparator
Placebo comparator
Time frame: Baseline to 14 days
SMH test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents re-hardening of enamel surface. Percent SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: [(D-R)/ (D-B)]*100.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 days
Enamel fluoride uptake was determined using the microdrill enamel biopsy technique. The amount of fluoride uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride (F) divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as ug*F/cm^3. The difference between treatments was calculated with respect to fluoride uptake by enamel.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
Exploratory Evaluation of an Experimental Fluoride Dentifrice Formulation Using an in Situ Remineralization/Fluoride Uptake Model
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07690644
Dental Erosion, Erosive Tooth Wear
View Trial DetailsNCT04208802
Dental Erosion, Stomatognathic Diseases
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04033263
Dental Caries, Dental Erosion
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05371717
Deglutition Disorders, Dental Erosion
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial Details