Non-Interventional Study
OtherNon-interventional study
Other names: Non-Interventional Observational Study, Noninterventional (Observational) Study
NCT Number: NCT07339254
This study evaluates patient satisfaction with receiving intravenous (IV) and/or subcutaneous (SC) immunotherapy and to assess patient preference for IV immunotherapy administration versus SC immunotherapy administration either at the hospital or at home.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess patient satisfaction with receiving IV immune checkpoint inhibitors, reflecting whether the patient thought that the experience was safe, convenient, comfortable and proceeded smoothly.
II. To assess patient preference for IV versus home SC ICI administration.
OUTLINE: This is an observational study.
Patients complete surveys on study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Non-interventional study
Other names: Non-Interventional Observational Study, Noninterventional (Observational) Study
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Outcome data will be collected using a questionnaire per study protocol. A Likert scale rating system of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree will be used. Summaries of data will be descriptive and standard statistical methods (median) will be used to present the results. Pearson's chi-square test, the Mantel-Haenszel test (or corresponding exact tests, if resulting expected numbers are small) will be used; the resulting p-value will be used as an indication of strength of an observed association.
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Outcome data will be collected using a questionnaire per study protocol. Results will be summarized with point estimates and confidence intervals; p-values, when calculated, will be used to indicate the strength of an observed association (not just the magnitude).
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Outcome data will be collected using a questionnaire per study protocol. A Likert scale rating system of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree will be used. Summaries of data will be descriptive and standard statistical methods (median) will be used to present the results. Pearson's chi-square test, the Mantel-Haenszel test (or corresponding exact tests, if resulting expected numbers are small) will be used; the resulting p-value will be used as an indication of strength of an observed association.
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Outcome data will be collected using a questionnaire per study protocol. A Likert scale rating system of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree will be used. Summaries of data will be descriptive and standard statistical methods (median) will be used to present the results. Pearson's chi-square test, the Mantel-Haenszel test (or corresponding exact tests, if resulting expected numbers are small) will be used; the resulting p-value will be used as an indication of strength of an observed association.
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Outcome data will be collected using a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions. The proportion of participants who select each possible category will be reported. The proportions should add up to 1.0. Results will be summarized in 2-way contingency tables to display any associations between these transportation responses. The Mantel-Haenszel test will be used to estimate the strength of the associations in each contingency table.
Time frame: At Baseline through study completion, up to 1 year.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29 v2.1) will be used. This is a standardized, self-report questionnaire with 29 items measuring core health areas like physical function, pain (interference & intensity), anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, and social participation, providing T-scores (mean 50, SD 10) for consistent comparison, used to capture patient-reported quality of life.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year.
Collected from the medical record and will be calculated using the start and end dates.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year.
Collected from the medical record.
University of Southern California
Other
Experiences With and Attitudes Towards Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - A Single Center, Survey-Based Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04267848
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06498635
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07388524
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05242965
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial Details