Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04585802

Expansion and Reevaluation of the Implicit Association Test in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters

A new approach to investigate suicidal processes belongs to the broader neurocognitive picture and are so-called implicit associations. In dual process models of information processing a second functioning mode, the automatic processing mode, complements the conscious processing. Suicidal persons tend to have a stronger implicit association with "death" than non-suicidal persons. In this study, implicit associations between different unconscious cognitive constructs are compared among suicidal and non-suicidal patients. Therefore, an adapted version of the computer-based reaction time task (IAT-S) will be used.

Four different versions of IATs are tested in this study. In the first version the implicit association between "self / others" and "death / life" is assessed (1). The second and third version measures the emotional evaluation of "death" (2) and "life" (3). In addition, in the fourth version the implicit association between death / life and internal / external locus of control is assessed (4).

The implicit associations of these four IAT-S versions are compared between three groups: patients with suicidal behavior, patients with suicidal ideation, and a clinical group without previous suicide attempts and without suicidal ideation.

The following hypotheses are made: in all four versions of the IAT-S, patients with previous suicidal behavior will have stronger implicit associations: between "self" and "death" as well as "death" and "internal locus of control" compared to all other groups. With a more "positive" evaluation of "death" and a more "negative" evaluation of "life" than all other participants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern

Bern, 3008, Switzerland

About this study

In this study, four versions of the suicide-specific implicit association tests (IAT-S) are carried out. Previous studies have shown that suicidal persons have stronger associations between the constructs "self" and "death". Furthermore, the strength of these implicit associations increases the risk of suicidal behavior in the follow-up period of six months by a factor of six. In these previous studies, the implicit "self-death association" (the so-called death-identity bias) was investigated. This study will additionally examine an implicit emotional evaluation (death-evaluation-bias). Therefore, two new versions of the IAT-S, which measure how death vs. life are emotionally evaluated, are being tested. In addition, a fourth version of the IAT-S was added and aims to clarify the implicit association between death / life and internal / external locus of control. Previous studies have shown that an internal locus of control is a protective factor and an external locus of control a risk factor for suicide attempts. In the present study, these four IAT-S versions are carried out with different groups of patients: patients with a suicide attempt (1), patients with suicide ideation (2) and patients with neither a suicide attempt nor suicide ideation (3). This cross sectional design allows us to test for group differences in regard to unconscious implicit associations. Hypothesis are described separately for each version of the IAT-S.

Death association: patients in group 1 will have a higher implicit association between self and death than patients in group 2 and that patients in group 2 have a significantly higher implicit association between self and death than patients in group 3.

Death evaluation: patients in group 1 will have more "positive" evaluations of "death" than patients in group 2 and patients in group 2 have a more "positive" evaluations of death than patients in group 3.

Locus of control: patients in group 1 will have a stronger association between internal locus of control and death (a) and external locus of control and life (b) than patients in group 2, and that patients in group 2 have a significantly stronger association between internal locus of control and death (a) and external locus of control and life (b) than patients in group 3.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Ability and willingness to participate in the study
  • Ability to give consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Foreign language
  • Diagnostic criteria: Psychoses, strong cognitive impairments (e.g. dementia)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Implicit Association Test (IAT)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The German version of the Suicide Implicit Association Test (Rath et al., 2018) is administered using a computer paradigm and is designed to measure implicit associations with death using D-values. D is an individual effect size assessment that reflects the comparative difficulty of performing the two response conditions of the IAT, with a value of 0 indicating that the tasks had equivalent performance (Greenwald et al., 2003). D has a theoretical minimum of -2 and maximum of +2 when blocks of the same size are compared (Nosek & Sriram, 2007). The more positive the D-values, the stronger the association between the "self" and "death" than between the "self" and "life".

Secondary outcomes

  1. Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire - Revised

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire measures suicidal behavior in the past and consists of four items. Item scores range from 3 to 18 with higher scores indicating more suicidal behavior (Osman et al., 2001).

  2. Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The Beck-Scale for Suicide Ideation measures suicidal thinking and consists of 21 items. Item scores range from 0 to 42 with higher scores indicating more suicidal ideation (Beck & Steer, 1993; Kliem & Brähler, 2016).

  3. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The Beck Depression Inventory measures the severity of depression and consists of 21 items. Item scores range from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating a higher intensity of depression (Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996).

  4. Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale measures psychological pain and consists of 10 items. Item scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating more psychological pain (Mee et al., 2011).

  5. Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    Positive Mental Health Scale measures positive mental health ans consists of 9 items. Item scores range from 9 to 36 with higher scores indicating more positive mental health (Lukat, Margraf, Lutz, van der Veld & Becker, 2016).

  6. Internal External Locus of Control-4 (IE-4)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The IE-4 is a Scale for the Assessment of Locus of Control and consists of two subscales with two items each. For each subscale, the mean value of the two items is calculated, which can range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indication more internal/external locus of control (Kemper, Beierlein, Kovaleva, & Rammstedt, 2012).

  7. Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.)

    Time frame: One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given

    The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is a brief structured diagnostic interview to assess the most common psychiatric disorders (Sheehan et al., 1998).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Bern

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital of Psychiatry, Department Neuropsychopharmacology and Brain Imaging

Registry information

Acronym: IAT-S

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.