Hospital das Clínicas
São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT03274518
Conventional hemodialysis (HD) is essential for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, by reducing serum concentration of uremic toxins and correcting fluid overload.
Nevertheless, HD removes almost exclusively low-range uremic toxins. Therefore, medium-range molecules, such as beta-2-microglobulin might accumulate in tissues, leading to many clinical complications, such as neuropathies, tendinopathies, anemia, bone mineral disease and reduced growth in children.
Convective methods might reduce incidence of these complications, by removing molecules of medium-range molecular weight. Online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) is the most extensively used method in this regard. Nevertheless, there are some barriers to the wider introduction of this method in clinical practice, since specific machines are needed for this procedure, the costs with dialysis lines are higher and water consumption increases. More recently, the development of new membranes for hemodialysis allowed removal of medium- and high-range uremic toxins, with albumin retention. Thus, they allow removal of a broad range of uremic toxins, without changing dialysis machine or increasing water consumption. Such therapy is known as expanded hemodialysis (HDx).
The aim of this present study is to compare the extraction of middle-size molecules, the hemodynamic behavior, fluid and nutritional status of patients submitted to olHDF or HDx, in a crossover study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
Hypothesis
Our hypothesis is that HDx is noninferior to olHDF in the following parameters:
Objectives To evaluate each patient, through a prospective, randomized and cross-over study, the intradialytic hemodynamic behavior, fluid and nutritional status assessed by electrical bioimpedance and B2M removal in two dialytic modalities: HDFol versus HDx.
Concise methods
Laboratory tests used to determine the biochemical, hematological and bone mineral profile characteristics will be obtained from routinely collected exams. Such exams are processed by the Central Laboratory of Hospital das Clínicas / FMUSP.
The olHDF will be prescribed as follows: blood flow 350 - 400 ml/min, dialysate flow 800 ml/min, post-dilution flow (90-100 ml/min), with high-flux Xevonta™ (BBraun Melsungen AG, Germany) or CAHP/DICE™ (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Germany) dialyzers, with surface area of 1.7-2.4 m². The duration of each session will be from 3,5h to 4h, depending on current dialysis prescription. Total substitution volume will be higher than 20 L per session.
HDx will follow the same prescription of olHDF, regarding blood and dialysate flows and dialysis duration. There will be no substitution volume. Theranova™ dialyzers (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Germany) will be used for each session.
Before initiating protocol and during the washout period, patients will be submitted to high-flux HD, which is the standard treatment in our service.
In addition, partial and homogeneous collection of the effluent will be performed by a drainage hose, with an infusion pump operating continuously at a rate of 1l/h. The whole effluent of dialysis session will be collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to expanded hemodialysis por 1 month.
High cutoff with high retention onset dialyzers allow clearance of middle molecules, without reducing significantly serum concentration of albumin. It allows higher convective clearance in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, but it is unknown if such clearance is similar to online hemodiafiltration. Therefore, the aim of the present intervention is to compare this dialyzer with online hemodiafiltration
Other names: Theranova Dialyzer
Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to online Hemodiafiltration por 1 month.
Online hemodiafiltration has been associated with lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension in comparison to conventional hemodialysis.
Time frame: One month after starting protocol
Beta-2-Microglobulin clearance
Time frame: One month after starting protocol
Beta-2-Microglobulin extraction
Time frame: Cardiac output (liters per minute) one month after starting protocol
noninvasive cardiac output assessment
Time frame: One month after starting protocol
noninvasive assessment of extracellular and total body water
University of Sao Paulo
Other
Expanded Hemodialysis Versus Online Hemodiafiltration: a Pilot Study on Intradialytic Hemodynamics and Fluid Status
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07071376
Dialysis Related Complication
Ankara, Türkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04218370
Acute Kidney Injury, Dialysis Related Complication
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03211676
Chronic Disease, Dialysis Amyloidosis
Poitiers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03836508
Chronic Disease, Dialysis Related Complication
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details