University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
NCT Number: NCT05930821
The overall objective of the proposed randomized controlled (RCT) is to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a 16-week theory-based, remotely-delivered, combined exercise (aerobic and resistance) training intervention for improving cognitive and physical function in older adults (50+ years) with multiple sclerosis (MS) who have mild-to-moderate cognitive and walking impairment. Participants (N=50) will be randomly assigned into exercise training (combined aerobic and resistance exercise) condition or active control (flexibility and stretching) condition. The 16-week intervention will be delivered and monitored remotely within a participant's home/community and supported by Zoom-based chats guided by social cognitive theory (SCT) via a behavioral coach. Participants will receive training materials (e.g., prescriptive manual and exercise equipment), one-on-one coaching, action-planning via calendars, self-monitoring via logs, and SCT-based newsletters. It is hypothesized that the home-based exercise intervention will yield beneficial effects on cognition, mobility, physical activity, and vascular function compared with an active control condition (flexibility and stretching intervention), and these improvements will be sustained during a 16-week follow-up period.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that is markedly increasing in prevalence amongst older adults. Older adults with MS present with poor health status and functioning, cognitive and ambulatory difficulty, dependence for activities of daily living, and reduced physical activity participation. The common approach for managing MS involves disease-modifying drugs, yet this first-line approach for medical management has little efficacy in older MS age groups (i.e., those 50+ years of age). Exercise training has been recognized as a promising approach for maintaining and/or restoring physical and cognitive health in older adults from the general population and younger adults with MS. To date, there is a dearth of research examining the benefits of exercise training among older adults with MS. The current study proposes a remotely-delivered exercise training program for improving cognition and mobility among older adults with MS. The proposed research adopts an innovative intervention approach (via telerehabilitation) with rigorous design for evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of a home-based exercise intervention program in older adults with MS who have cognitive and walking impairment. This exercise training program adopts an innovative intervention approach via telerehabilitation and is convenient and accessible for older adults with MS. This research may have practical relevance for improving physical activity among older adults with MS through alleviating travel concerns and reducing environmental/social barriers. If successful, the proposed project will provide foundations for implementing larger, high-quality RCTs using remotely-delivered exercise intervention for managing the consequences of aging and MS and ultimately contributing to successful aging with MS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Changes in BICAMS test scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS); the total test scores range between 0 (min) and 236 (max), higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Time frame: Changes in NIH toolbox cognitive test scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
National Institute of Health Toolbox (NIH toolbox) with customized cognitive test battery; the scores range between 0 (min) and 186 (max), higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Time frame: Changes in physical function scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); the performance scores range between 0 (min) and 12 (max) points, higher scores reflect better physical function.
Time frame: Changes in lower-extremity function scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
30-Second Sit to Stand Test (30STS). The score is the number of complete repetitions of sit-to-stand movements performed during 30 seconds; the minimum value is 0 repetitions, and the maximum value depends on individuals' performance. Higher scores reflect better lower extremity function.
Time frame: Changes in functional mobility scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG); the score is the average time (in seconds) for completing two trials. The minimum and maximum scores depend on individuals' performance; shorter time (lower scores) reflects better functional mobility.
Time frame: Changes in walking endurance scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MW); the score is the total walking distance (in meters) during the 6 minutes. The minimum value is 0 meter, and the maximum value depends on individuals' performance. A longer distance (higher scores) indicates better walking endurance.
Time frame: Changes in walking speed scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Timed 25-foot Walking Test (T25FW); the score is the average speed (25 feet divided by time, ft/s) for completing two trials. The minimum and maximum scores (time) depend on individuals' performance. A faster speed represents better ambulatory performance.
Time frame: Changes in time spent in MVPA from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) will be measured by a waist-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph model GT3X+); a longer time (in seconds) reflects a higher level of physical activity.
Time frame: Changes in daily step count from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Daily step count will be measured by a waist-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph model GT3X+); a greater number of steps per day reflects a higher level of physical activity.
Time frame: Changes in the GLTEQ scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ); scores range between 0 (min) and 119 (max), higher scores indicate greater engagement in exercise behavior.
Time frame: Changes in central blood pressure from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Central blood pressure will be measured by waveform analysis using the SphygmoCor XCEL System. A higher value (in millimeters of mercury, or mmHg) indicate higher blood pressure.
Time frame: Changes in augmentation index from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Augmentation index is a biomarker for arterial stiffness and will be measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL System. A higher value (percentage) indicates greater arterial stiffness.
Time frame: Changes in cfPWV from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a biomarker for arterial stiffness and will be measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL System. A higher value (meters/second) indicates greater arterial stiffness.
Time frame: Changes in fatigue severity scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS); scores range between 1 (min) and 7 (max), higher scores reflect greater fatigue severity.
Time frame: Changes in fatigue impact scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS); scores range between 0 (min) and 84 (max), higher scores reflect a greater impact of fatigue on daily life.
Time frame: Changes in depressive symptoms scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); scores range between 0 (min) and 21 (max), higher scores reflect greater frequency of anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Changes in anxiety scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); scores range between 0 (min) and 21 (max), higher scores reflect greater frequency of anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Changes in pain level from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ); scores range between 0 (min) and 45 (max), higher scores reflect higher level of pain.
Time frame: Changes in sleep quality scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); scores range between 0 (min) and 21 (max), higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Time frame: Changes in SF-36 scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Short Form Health Status Survey (SF-36); scores range between 0 (min) and 100 (max), higher scores indicate better physical and mental aspects of quality of life.
Time frame: Changes in MSIS-29 scores from Baseline (pre-intervention), after 16 weeks (post-intervention), and after 32 weeks (follow-up)
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29); scores range between 0 (min) and 100 (max), higher scores indicate greater impact of disease on daily function (i.e. worse outcomes).
University of Illinois at Chicago
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07432009
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Brno, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06246929
Behavior, Chronic Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07207993
AI-Based Fitness, Behavior
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05373745
Behavior, Chronic Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details