University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
NCT Number: NCT05000502
Understanding the impact exercise has on a cancer survivor's gut microbiome can improve the health and well-being of cancer survivors by enhancing treatments targeting the gut microbiome. Although scientific studies support a link between exercise and the gut microbiome, rigorous randomized trials needed to confirm this causal link are limited and usually involve supervised exercise. Hence, this proposal tests feasibility of a home-based, remote-only research protocol that is more accessible to cancer survivors unable to attend supervised exercise including but not limited to rural populations. This study will also determine if exercise effects on the gut microbiome differ by factors such as race.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Forty physically inactive breast cancer survivors will be randomized into 10-week conditions of home-based aerobic exercise training or standard attention control. All participants will be asked to maintain their pre-study diet and attempt to maintain their body weight while participating in the study. Assessments will occur at baseline, week 5 (mid-intervention), and week 10 (post-intervention) by videoconference platform. Study feasibility and changes in the gut microbiome will be assessed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A 10-week home-based exercise intervention including weekly video conferences with exercise specialists.
Time frame: Baseline
Number of participants excluded or not agreeing to participate will be measured
Time frame: Throughout 10 week study period
Feasibility measure (e.g. percent of assessments and intervention sessions completed
Time frame: Throughout 10 week study period
Feasibility measure of the number of participants who dropout or are withdrawn
Time frame: Throughout 10 week study period
Feasibility measure of the number of adverse events recorded by staff during the study period
Time frame: At conclusion of 10 week study period
Self-Administered survey given to the participant at the conclusion of the 10 week study period
Time frame: Baseline
Motion sensor measures physical activity not observed during intervention activities
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Motion sensor measures physical activity not observed during intervention activities
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Motion sensor measures physical activity not observed during intervention activities
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of body fat percentage (0-100%) where a lower percentage is better.
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Measurement of body fat percentage (0-100%) where a lower percentage is better.
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Measurement of body fat percentage (0-100%) where a lower percentage is better.
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of muscle mass (0 - max body weight in kilograms) where having more muscle mass can be considered positive.
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Measurement of muscle mass (0 - max body weight in kilograms) where having more muscle mass can be considered positive.
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Measurement of muscle mass (0 - max body weight in kilograms) where having more muscle mass can be considered positive.
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of height (m) and weight (kg) to assess body mass index, where a higher body mass index is worse.
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Measurement of height (m) and weight (kg) to assess body mass index, where a higher body mass index is worse.
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Measurement of height (m) and weight (kg) to assess body mass index, where a higher body mass index is worse.
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a 2-minute step test measured by study staff through videoconference
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Participants will complete a 2-minute step test measured by study staff through videoconference
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Participants will complete a 2-minute step test measured by study staff through videoconference
Time frame: Baseline
Using standard diversity and taxa comparison metrics
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Using standard diversity and taxa comparison metrics
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Using standard diversity and taxa comparison metrics
Time frame: Baseline
Fatigue Symptom Inventory which contains 13 items (fatigue intensity = mean of 4 items, 1 to 10 scale; fatigue interference = mean of 7 items, 0 to 10 scale; 2 general fatigue items = 0 to 7 scale and 1 to 10 scale); higher score indicates greater fatigue
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Fatigue Symptom Inventory which contains 13 items (fatigue intensity = mean of 4 items, 1 to 10 scale; fatigue interference = mean of 7 items, 0 to 10 scale; 2 general fatigue items = 0 to 7 scale and 1 to 10 scale); higher score indicates greater fatigue
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Fatigue Symptom Inventory which contains 13 items (fatigue intensity = mean of 4 items, 1 to 10 scale; fatigue interference = mean of 7 items, 0 to 10 scale; 2 general fatigue items = 0 to 7 scale and 1 to 10 scale); higher score indicates greater fatigue
Time frame: Baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] which contains 14 items (depression = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale; anxiety = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale) higher scores indicate greater depression and/or anxiety
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] which contains 14 items (depression = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale; anxiety = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale) higher scores indicate greater depression and/or anxiety
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] which contains 14 items (depression = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale; anxiety = total of 7 items, 0 to 3 scale) higher scores indicate greater depression and/or anxiety
Time frame: Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which contains 7 components (sleep dysfunction = total of 7 components, 0 to 3 scale) higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which contains 7 components (sleep dysfunction = total of 7 components, 0 to 3 scale) higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which contains 7 components (sleep dysfunction = total of 7 components, 0 to 3 scale) higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical health in adults (T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population) a higher score (higher SD) indicates greater pain
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical health in adults (T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population) a higher score (higher SD) indicates greater pain
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical health in adults (T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population) a higher score (higher SD) indicates greater pain
Time frame: Baseline
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) which contains 20 items (PTSD intensity = total of 20 items, 0 to 4 scale) higher score indicates greater PTSD
Time frame: 5 weeks after baseline
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) which contains 20 items (PTSD intensity = total of 20 items, 0 to 4 scale) higher score indicates greater PTSD
Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) which contains 20 items (PTSD intensity = total of 20 items, 0 to 4 scale) higher score indicates greater PTSD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
Acronym: EMBRACE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06618690
Behavior, Breast Diseases
Àlmeria, Alemeria, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT01671319
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06092892
Axilla; Breast, Axillary Nodal Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05792150
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Baden-Baden, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial Details