University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94518, United States
NCT Number: NCT05720468
This study will evaluate the safety and feasibility of a home-based, virtually-supervised, combined high intensity endurance and resistance training program in people with Parkinson's disease. It will also evaluate the effects of exercise on cognition and underlying exercise-related biological markers (biomarkers).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94518, United States
Cognitive impairment begins early in Parkinson's disease (PD) and progresses to dementia in a majority of patients, impairing quality of life and contributing to growing health-related costs. Physical exercise has potent anti-aging effects and improves many outcomes in PD including cognition. Identifying biomarkers that respond to exercise, and how they associate with cognition and underlying disease pathology, may elucidate key mechanisms for countering cognitive decline. This is a randomized-controlled trial that evaluates safety and feasibility of a home-based exercise intervention in people with PD and measure its effects on cognition and circulating biomarkers of aging and stress. Thirty-two participants with PD will be randomized to receive a home-based, trainer-supervised endurance and resistance training program (exercise group) or no exercise (wait list control group) for 26 weeks. Cognitive assessments and patient reported outcomes will be obtained at baseline and at end of 26 weeks. Biomarkers in periphery (blood, saliva) and brain [cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)] will also be measured before and after the 26-week exercise intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Combined endurance and resistance exercise training
Continue usual level of physical activity; option to participate in exercise training program after 26-week intervention period
Time frame: From weeks 5-26, every exercise session
The overall average percent HR max will be compared to the target percent HR max (80-85 percent).
Time frame: From weeks 5-26, every exercise session
The overall average repetition maximum for resistance exercise will be compared to the target repetition maximum (10-repetition maximum)
Time frame: From weeks 5-26, every week
The average number of days per week exercised will be compared to target adherence (5 days/week of exercise)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30, with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Change from baseline in the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale motor score (Part III). The minimum score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III is 0 and the maximum is 132 with higher scores representing worse motor symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in blood levels of klotho
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in CSF levels of klotho
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in saliva levels of cortisol
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in CSF levels of cortisol
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in blood levels of CRP
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in CSF levels of CRP
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in blood levels of BDNF
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in CSF levels of BDNF
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in maximal knee extension measured in peak torque
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in handgrip strength measured in kilograms using dynamometer
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in maximal oxygen consumption measured with peak oxygen volume
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in distance in 6-minute walk
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in quality of life measured with the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month covering 8 dimensions scored on a 5 point ordinal system (0=never, 4=always). Dimension score = sum of scores of each item in the dimension divided by the maximum possible score of all the items in the dimension, multiplied by 100. Each dimension total score range from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better QoL. Overall score can be summarized in the Parkinson's Disease Summary Index (PDSI) or PDQ-39 Summary Index (PDQ-39 SI).PDSI or PDQ-39 SI = sum of dimension total scores divided by 8.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in mood measuring using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report inventory designed to measure the severity of depression symptomatology. Each item is evaluated on a severity scale ranging from 0-3, with a total score ranging from 0-63. A score of 0-13 is considered none or minimal range depression; 14-19 mild is considered mild depression; 20-28 is considered moderate depression and 29-63 is considered severe depression.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in the National Institute of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery, a comprehensive, performance-based test comprised of motor, emotion, sensation, and cognition assessments. For the purpose of this study, the investigators will be using the cognitive battery to assess processes involved in learning and comprehension (i.e. thinking, remembering, problem-solving, judging). The battery consists of tasks involving the use of executive function, memory, attention, and language.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in alternate phonemic/semantic fluency test. This test measures executive cognitive function. Participants are required to alternate letter-cued words with category-cued words. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Change from baseline in Trail Making Test. This test is commonly used for the evaluation of attentional processes and cognitive flexibility. The Trail Making Test contains two components. The first part only demands simpler attentional processes - seeking numbers spread throughout a page, while the second involves a flexibility component requiring the participant to switch between numbers and letters during the test run. Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Acronym: EXCEL-PD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06133283
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05766813
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07723027
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Shakargarh, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07361250
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial Details