Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05251480

Examining the Effectiveness of DermGEN™ in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in First Nations People

The study will examine the effectiveness of a decellularized dermal matrix (i.e., DermGEN™) in improving wound healing, quality of life and associated costs of treatment of DFUs in First Nations people living in the Northwestern Ontario Communities. First Nations people with active diabetic foot (DFU) ulcer attending a wound care clinic located at the Rainy River district office. An interventional, two-arm, randomized, prospective study of (1) standard of care (control) vs. (2) DermGEN™ - a decellularized dermal matrix (treatment) will be used in the treatment and management of DFU. Patients will be randomized to each arm (n=60 per arm) based on power calculations using data from our Pilot study.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant and social support (e.g., family, caregiver) ready and willing to participate and comply with follow-up regime
  • Participant willing to be involved in self-care (e.g., keep dressing dry at home) required during treatment
  • Participant willing to wear Total Contact Cast (TCC) for wound off-loading during treatment
  • Participant or legal representative has read and signed the informed consent form
  • Documented stable Type I or II diabetes (HbA1C between 5.0 to 10 mmol/L within 1 month prior to Day 0)
  • Ulcer has been present for a minimum of 2 weeks as of Day 0
  • Ulcer area is ≥2 cm2 prior to debridement at Day 0 of study
  • Ulcer extends through dermis and into subcutaneous tissue but without exposure of muscle, tendon, bone or joint capsule
  • Ulcer is free of dead tissue and clinical infection, and is comprised of healthy vascular tissue suitable for skin grafting on Day 0
  • Adequate perfusion to the extremity determined by at least one of the following:

Palpable pedal pulses, Transcutaneous oxygen measurement at the dorsum of the foot ≥30 mm Hg, Ankle-brachial index ranging from 0.8 to 1.2, At least biphasic Doppler arterial waveforms at the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries

Exclusion criteria

  • The individual has any condition that seriously compromises their capacity to provide consent and answers questions related to this study.
  • Untreated infection of soft tissue or bone and/or autoimmune connective tissue disorders
  • Ulcer is over Charcot deformity (joints deformity of foot and ankle common in people with diabetes)
  • Body mass index ≥50 kg/m2
  • Ulcer is not classified as diabetes-related
  • Ulcer has tunnels or sinus tracts that cannot be completely debrided
  • Medical condition(s) that in the investigators' opinion make the patient inappropriate for study (e.g active liver disease)
  • Presence of malignant disease not in remission for 5 years or more
  • The individual is undergoing chemotherapy/radiation therapy
  • The individual received radiation therapy within 30 days of Day 0 of study
  • The individual is taking an immunosuppressant medication (e.g., corticosteroids, immunosuppression or cytotoxic agents), or is anticipated to require such agents during study
  • Presence of acute or chronic hepatitis, liver disease, anemia, serum albumin <2.0 gm/dL, or has alkaline phosphatase or LDH at twice the normal upper limit
  • Obvious clinical signs and symptoms of ongoing tissue infection (i.e., cellulitis) or bone infection (i.e., osteomyelitis)
  • Female individuals are pregnant at time or intend to get pregnant during study time
  • The individual has known allergies to antibiotics, such as penicillin and streptomycin
  • The individual is an active smoker (smoke one or more cigarette a day)
  • The individual has a history of a bleeding disorder or is taking blood thinner medication

Treatment and study plan

Standard of care

Procedure

debridement, wound dressings, offloading

DermGEN™

Other

Decellularized human dermal matrix created from donated human skin

Other names: Acellular Dermal Matrix

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean and median reduction in wound area in the first 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.

  2. Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)

  3. Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)

  4. Incidence of adverse events.

    Time frame: Reports included at any time up to and including 20 weeks post treatment.

    Number of adverse events observed for each arm divided by participants in each arm, reported as a percentage

  5. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 1 week

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  6. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  7. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  8. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  9. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  10. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  11. Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  12. Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  13. Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  14. Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

  15. Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion with complete healing at any time point

    Time frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)

    Number of wounds closed (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)at any time divided by the number of participants in each arm reported as a percentage

  2. Time to first-measured complete healing

    Time frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)

    Time to first-measured complete healing (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)

  3. Mean and median reduction in wound area at 8 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.

  4. Mean and median reduction in wound area at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Idevania Costa, RN, NSWOC (S), Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

647-230-4742

Joanne Ogden, RN,NSWOC

CONTACT

[email protected]

807-486-3407

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

DeCell Technologies Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Dalhousie University
  • Lakehead University

Registry information

Official study title

Examining the Effectiveness of DermGEN™ Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in First Nations People Living in Northwestern Ontario Communities

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 22, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.