Boston College
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02476, United States
NCT Number: NCT04372888
The goal of this application is to gain a deeper understanding of decision-making for genetic testing and identify effective choice-architecture-based strategies to improve decisions in genetic testing. The investigators hypothesize that choice architecture (i.e. framing) affects decision-making for hypothetical genetic testing scenarios.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02476, United States
After providing opt-in electronic consent, eligible consented participants will be randomized to one of two hypothetical genetic testing scenarios (rare, life-altering genetic condition or common, life-threatening genetic condition). The genetic testing scenarios include brief detailed information about genetic testing (i.e. how results may influence treatment decisions) as well as information about standard approaches to treatment. Subjects will be randomized to receive a framing conditions (e.g. choice, opt-in, opt-out, enhanced choice). Participants will select a preferred testing option to the hypothetical scenario and will complete several validated instruments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
active choice for genetic testing
"gain" frame for genetic testing
"loss" frame for genetic testing
consequences of genetic testing
social norms for genetic testing
commitments for genetic testing
Time frame: after reading the scenario and viewing frame (approximately 10 minutes)
Opting "yes" for genetic testing or "no" refusing genetic testing
Time frame: study completion (approximately 30 minutes)
SWD is a validated 6-item instrument, items are scored on a 1-5 scale with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the decision taken
Time frame: study completion (approximately 30 minutes)
DRS is a validated 5-item instrument, items are scored on a 1-5 scale with higher scores indicating more regret with the decision taken
Time frame: study completion (approximately 30 minutes)
NVS is a validated 6-item instrument, questions are based on reading and interpreting a food label, higher scores (more correct answers) indicate greater levels of literacy and numeracy abilities
Time frame: Baseline (study onset)
Single "yes"/"no" question to determine a personal or family experience the genetic condition being presented in the scenario (arm)
Boston College
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07692698
Decision Making, Executive Functions (EF)
Elâzığ, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07479368
Decision Making, Football Players
Medellín, Colombia
View Trial DetailsNCT05173922
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04466865
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details