The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania, 16870, United States
NCT Number: NCT04310735
The study will use functional magnetic resonance imaging and facial coding methods to study individuals who smoke cigarettes. Smoking expectancy (the extent to which one perceives an opportunity to smoke a cigarette) will be manipulated using instructions, and the investigators will examine the effects of this manipulation on two primary endpoints under conditions designed to induce an urge to smoke: (1) brain responses measured using fMRI and (2) subjective affective responses measured using facial coding. Secondary endpoints include self-report measures of the desire to smoke and current affect.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University Park, Pennsylvania, 16870, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Instructions regarding whether or not participants will have an opportunity to smoke during the experimental session.
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was analyzed as participants were presented with smoking-related and neutral cues. Following preprocessing with fMRIPrep (version 20.2.7), the FMRI Expert Analysis Tool (FEAT) from FMRIB's Software Library (FSL; version 6.0.7.4) was used to characterize brain activation differences in response to smoking-related versus neutral cues. Contrast of parameter estimate (COPE) values were calculated for each participant, and these COPE values were then extracted for two a priori regions of interest (ROIs) to compare activation patterns between the groups. Larger COPE values indicate greater differences in brain activation between smoking-related and neutral cues,
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Subjective affective responses were measured by using FaceReader software (version 9.1.7) to code the valence (positive or negative) of facial movements associated with emotional expression during the presentation of smoking-related and neutral cues. Possible values for valence range from -1 to 1, with higher values indicating greater positive affect,
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Participants rated their urge to smoke during the presentation of smoking-related and neutral cues on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a stronger desire to smoke. For each type of cue (smoking-related and neutral), repeated ratings were obtained across multiple trials. To report a single value for each Arm/Group, the ratings were averaged across all trials for each cue type.
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Participants rated their current affect during the presentation of smoking-related and neutral cues on a scale ranging from 1 (very negative) to 9 (very positive), with higher scores indicating greater positive affect. For each type of cue (smoking-related and neutral), repeated ratings were obtained across multiple trials. To report a single value for each Arm/Group, the ratings were averaged across all trials for each cue type.
Time frame: Day 1 (Visit 1)
Participants' level of nicotine dependence was assessed using the total score on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence to help characterize the sample. Possible scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater nicotine dependence.
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was analyzed as participants were presented with cues designed to elicit positive and negative emotion. Following preprocessing with fMRIPrep (version 20.2.7), the FMRI Expert Analysis Tool (FEAT) from FMRIB's Software Library (FSL; version 6.0.7.4) was used to characterize brain activation in response to positive and negative emotion cues. Contrast of parameter estimate (COPE) values were calculated for each participant, and these COPE values were then extracted for two a priori regions of interest (ROIs) to compare activation patterns between the groups. Larger COPE values indicate greater differences in brain activation between positive and negative emotion cues.
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Subjective affective responses were measured by using FaceReader software (version 9.1.7) to code the valence (positive or negative) of facial movements associated with emotional expression during the presentation of cues designed to elicit positive and negative emotion. Possible values for valence range from -1 to 1, with higher values indicating greater positive affect,
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Participants rated their urge to smoke during the presentation of cues designed to elicit positive and negative emotions on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a stronger desire to smoke. For each type of cue (positive and negative emotion), repeated ratings were obtained across multiple trials. To report a single value for each Arm/Group, the ratings were averaged across all trials for each cue type.
Time frame: Approximately Day 7 (Visit 2)
Participants rated their current affect during the presentation of cues designed to elicit positive and negative emotion on a scale ranging from 1 (very negative) to 9 (very positive), with higher scores indicating greater positive affect. For each type of cue (positive and negative emotion), repeated ratings were obtained across multiple trials. To report a single value for each Arm/Group, the ratings were averaged across all trials for each cue type.
Penn State University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03950427
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03113136
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03496077
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04889638
Behavior, Health Behavior
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details