Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05405244

Examination of Bromocriptine on Homeostatic and Hedonic Mechanisms of Food Intake in Individuals at High Risk for T2DM

The current project applies an integrative three-prong approach to investigate the potential of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) agonist bromocriptine to: 1) increase homeostatic satiation signaling, 2) alter neural circuitry to reduce hedonically motivated food intake, and 3) examines a genetic predisposition that may markedly impact the effectiveness of this medication in those at high risk for T2DM.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

About this study

Twenty-nine million Americans have diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), with fewer than half able to meet treatment goals and considerably more are at risk for development of T2DM. Implementation of healthy eating behavior has been identified as a barrier to T2DM treatment and efficacy. The determinants of eating behavior and weight regulation involve a complex interaction among individual-level homeostatic, hedonic, and genetic systems, and the external food environment. The high prevalence of obesity and T2DM suggests hedonic motivation to consume food overrides homeostatic satiation signaling, resulting in excess food intake. Elevated intake increases body mass and promotes T2DM incidence via dysregulation of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), amylin, and adiponectin, which in turn can negatively impact T2DM treatment options.

Use of a pharmaceutical, such as bromocriptine, to aid in behavioral change is a novel method for treating and ameliorating T2DM and warrants investigation given that previous work has shown reward response to food images mediates T2DM control. Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques to predict and evaluate hedonically-motivated eating behavior can be used to measure sensitivity to reward, and the role it plays in developing obesity, and is therefore an excellent tool to examine the associations among bromocriptine, satiety hormones, reward sensitivity and eating behavior.

Moreover, since 20-35% of the population carries the DRD2 TaqIA A1 allele, and 65% of the population is overweight or obese and at high risk for T2DM development or currently diagnosed, as much as 23% of the population may greatly benefit from dopamine agonist treatment. Despite the possibility that bromocriptine may have robust impact on T2DM treatment or as prevention therapy in those that are genetically predisposed, few data are available that directly examine the three systems (homeostatic, hedonic, genetic) available to assess whether a genetically-informed, personalized T2DM treatment is viable.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Baseline BMI between 25 and 35

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals with current fMRI contraindications (e.g., metal implants, braces)
  • Probable current Axis I psychopathology (e.g., major depression disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder)
  • Habitual use of cigarettes or illicit drugs
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Diagnosis of serious medical problems (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke)
  • Current weight loss dieting and/or weight fluctuations great than 10 lbs in the previous 6 weeks
  • Do not consume dairy
  • Allergy to bromocriptine, dairy, and nuts

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

2 capsules, orally administered once

Other names: placebo (calcium supplement)

Bromocriptine-QR

Drug

1.6mg (2 0.8mg capsules), orally administered once

Other names: quick-release (QR) bromocriptine (cycloset)

Primary outcomes

  1. Ad Libitum Food and Beverage Intake (g)

    Time frame: Within 15 minutes of completion of the ad libitum period

    Ad libitum food intake of highly-palatable snacks is assessed during each intervention arm. Participants are left alone for 25 minutes to eat as much as they want from a selection of snacks (M&Ms, Skittles, Doritos, cheddar popcorn) and a chocolate milkshake. Both snacks and milkshake are pre- and post-weighed to determine ad libitum food intake.

  2. Hedonic Ratings of Food as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: Up to 5 minutes prior to ad libitum period start

    Testing the effects of the drug on hedonic ratings (pleasantness, desire to consume) of milkshake and snacks on a scale from -100 to 100.

    Pleasantness was assessed by asking 'How pleasant is this taste?', with responses ranging from -100 (most unpleasant imaginable) to 100 (most pleasant imaginable).

    Desire to consume was assessed by asking 'How much would you want to eat/drink this?', with responses ranging from -100 (least desirable imaginable) to 100 (most desirable imaginable).

  3. Change in Voxel-wise Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Brain Activation in Response to Milkshake Anticipation and Receipt vs. Water

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks

    The fMRI paradigm assesses evoked BOLD response to cue-elicited anticipation and receipt of a milkshake and water. A region-of-interest (ROI) approach is used to assess changes in BOLD signal in the striatum. The striatal response is assessed for the two contrasts of interest: milkshake>h2o anticipation and milkshake>h2o receipt. Positive values reflect a higher striatal BOLD activation for the milkshake; negative reflects a higher striatal BOLD activation for the water. Parameter estimates of the relative BOLD response to each of these contrasts are extracted and compared between the two arms.

    The paradigm has 64 trials and each trial starts with the presentation of a cue for 1s signaling the impending delivery of either 3 mL of highly palatable milkshake or a control water solution over a period of 6s. Taste delivery is followed by a wait period and rinse (tasteless solution). The next trial begins after a 1-9s jitter. Order of milkshake and water trials is pseudo-randomized.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ad Libitum Food and Milkshake Intake (g) by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)

    Time frame: Within 15 minutes of completion of the ad libitum period

    Testing the drug by gene (TaqIA) interaction on ad libitum food intake (g).The presence of the high-risk A1 allele of the TaqIA polymorphism (rs1800497) in the DRD2 gene was determined from saliva samples and is compared to the A2/A2 variant.

  2. Hedonic Ratings of Milkshake Pleasantness and Desire as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)

    Time frame: Up to 5 minutes prior to ad libitum period start

    Testing the drug by gene (TaqIA) interaction on hedonic ratings (pleasantness, desire to consume) of milkshake on a scale from -100 to 100. Testing the drug by gene (TaqIA) interaction on ad libitum milkshake (g). The presence of the high-risk A1 allele of the TaqIA polymorphism (rs1800497) in the DRD2 gene was determined from saliva samples and is compared to the A2/A2 variant.

    Pleasantness was assessed by asking 'How pleasant is this taste?', with responses ranging from -100 (most unpleasant imaginable) to 100 (most pleasant imaginable).

    Desire to consume was assessed by asking 'How much would you want to eat/drink this?', with responses ranging from -100 (least desirable imaginable) to 100 (most desirable imaginable).

  3. Change in Voxel-wise Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Brain Activation in Response to Milkshake Anticipation and Receipt vs. Water by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks

    The fMRI paradigm assesses evoked BOLD response to cue-elicited anticipation and receipt of a milkshake and water. A region-of-interest (ROI) approach is used to assess changes in BOLD signal in the striatum. The striatal response is assessed for the two contrasts of interest: milkshake>h2o anticipation and milkshake>h2o receipt. Positive values reflect a higher striatal BOLD activation for the milkshake; negative reflects a higher striatal BOLD activation for the water. Parameter estimates of the relative BOLD response to these contrasts are extracted and used to test the drug by gene (TaqIA) interaction.

    The paradigm has 64 trials and each trial starts with the presentation of a cue signaling the impending delivery of either 3 mL of highly palatable milkshake or a control water solution over a 6s period. Taste delivery is followed by a wait period and rinse (tasteless solution). The next trial begins after a 1-9s jitter. Order of milkshake and water trials is pseudo-randomized.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Other

Collaborators

  • American Diabetes Association

Registry information

Official study title

A Multimodel Examination of Bromocriptine on Homeostatic and Hedonic Mechanisms of Food Intake in Individuals at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 6, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 7, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.