Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06895785

Exalt Single-use Duodenoscope Vs Reusable Scope, a Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to evaluate the new generation Exalt Model disposable duodenoscope compared to the reusable scope in terms of feasibility, ease of use, adverse events, number of crossover events, and infection rates.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Amanda F Lin

CONTACT

[email protected]

3125633907

About this study

To ensure a safe and high-quality endoscopy, there are multiple disinfection protocols for endoscopes. Side-viewing duodenoscopes with an adjustable accessory device (elevator) contain potential blind spots for debris and bacteria that require specialized cleaning and disinfection methods beyond standard protocols for other endoscopes. It is thought that the duodenoscope's design, persistent postprocedural microbial contamination and biofilm formation make it more prone to cross-contamination5. Gromski et al, found there are documented pathogenic transmissions, which led to harm in multiple patients and centers3. Infection control was likely related to two major components, reusable duodenoscopes and procedural factors related to how the reusable duodenoscopes were reprocessed3. Multidrug-resistant organisms, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, that were associated with reusable duodenoscopes lead the FDA to mandate the transition to improved cleaning and disinfection methods or single-use platforms to eliminate infection transmission. One such single-use platform is the Exalt Model D (Boston Scientific, Marlboro, MA), which received FDA approval in 2020 for use of single-use duodenoscopes. Early iterations of the Exalt were used on a case-by-case basis per institution-specific protocols, mainly due to the learning curve involved with using the scope. A new version of Exalt has been released to market in 2023 with modifications that may make it more feasible to use in all settings requiring a duodenoscope. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to evaluate the new generation Exalt Model disposable duodenoscope compared to the reusable scope in terms of feasibility, ease of use, adverse events, number of crossover events, and infection rates.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients > 18 years old who have biliary or pancreatic duct disorder, based on clinical symptoms and radiological findings at CT or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
  • Native papilla

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
  • Prior history of ERCP
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Exalt Model D

Device

Exalt Model D single-use duodenoscope will be used in ERCP

Other names: Single-use duodenoscope

Reusable

Device

Standard reusable duodenoscope will be used in ERCP

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of attempts required to achieve successful cannulation of the desired duct

    Time frame: From the time of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care

    Measure and compare the total number of attempts required to achieve successful cannulation of the desired duct.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Crossover single to reusable

    Time frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure

    The incidence of crossovers from single-use duodenoscope to reusable duodenoscope

  2. Use of advanced cannulation techniques

    Time frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure

    The utilization of advanced cannulation techniques in ERCP procedure

  3. Performance on ERCP maneuvers

    Time frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure

    Subjective ratings on 14 ERCP maneuvers. ("not preferred/neutral/preferred" relative to the reusable duodenoscope endoscopist usually uses in clinical practice), 23 device performance characteristics. (Likert scale of 1 [not preferred] to 5 [comparable with reusable duodenoscope])

  4. Adverse events

    Time frame: From the completion of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care

    Post- ERCP pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy bleed, and infection at 72 hours and 7 days post-ERCP procedure per Standard of Care.

  5. Endoscopist-determined ease of use

    Time frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure

    Median overall satisfaction with the single-use duodenoscope during the procedure (Likert scale of 1 [unsatisfied] to 10 [very satisfied], followed by the option "If you answered ≤ 5, specify reason")

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Amanda F Lin

CONTACT

[email protected]

3125633907

Neal A Mehta, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

3129428651

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Mar 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.