Transcranial ExAblate
DeviceOther names: ExAblate, TcMRgFUS, Thalamotomy
NCT Number: NCT01827904
The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind (to subjects, local site's blinded assessor and Tremor Core Lab assessors), crossover, multi-site, two-arm study (ExAblate treated arm Vs ExAblate Sham treated control arm) is to test the efficacy of treatment using the ExAblate Transcranial System and to further demonstrate safety in medication-refractory tremor in subjects with essential tremor (ET).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
This study is evaluating a new technique for performing Thalamotomy for tremor control. While current techniques have possible invasive or radiation effects, the use of ExAblate if totally non-invasive and without any radiation. After informed consent and screening, eligible subjects will be randomized to either an ExAblate treatment or an ExAblate Sham or "fake" procedure. The chance of randomization to Sham is one out of four. Subjects who are randomized to Sham Control will undergo the same procedure and follow-up visits through their Month 3 visit. After the Month 3 assessments are complete, all subjects will be unblinded and those in the Sham treated group will have the option for an actual ExAblate treatment in an unblinded fashion, as long as they still qualify for ExAblate treatment. All subjects will be followed at 6 and 12 months and for up to 5 years as directed by their doctor.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: ExAblate, TcMRgFUS, Thalamotomy
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months post-treatment
The percent change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that was used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months were used to calculate percent change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Time frame: 5 Years post treatment.
The cumulative sum of adverse events was followed through Year 5 of the study.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The percent change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that was used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and Follow Up were used to calculate percent change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The Posture Score is a sub-Score of the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor CRST Part A - Posture (Treated Side Upper Extremity Posture Score). The scores range 0-12 and higher scores indicate worse outcomes. For percent improvement compared to Baseline (pre-treatment visit) higher percents mean better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The percent change from baseline to follow-up QUEST Summary Total was used to assess quality of life changes over time in tremor patients. The QUEST consists of five dimensions for each subject converted to a percent of the total (0-100%). The summary total is the average of the five dimensions. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
InSightec
Industry
A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS Thalamotomy Treatment of Medication Refractory Essential Tremor Subjects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03027310
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06235190
Central Nervous System Diseases, Essential Tremor
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05842434
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03760406
Central Nervous System Diseases, Essential Tremor
Bordeaux, France
View Trial Details