Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06883175

Evolution of the Chicago Classification: Bridging Physiology and Mechanics

Swallowing difficulties are extremely common and result in substantial morbidity, reduction in the quality of life, and mortality related to malnutrition and complications from regurgitation and aspiration. Unfortunately, our understanding regarding the pathophysiology of dysphagia and GERD has been hampered by focusing predominantly on circular muscle activity and ignoring the essential biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall that promote normal emptying. Our initial work explored the relationship between intrabolus pressure (IBP) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) compliance as a metric for outflow resistance. This work highlighted the direct relationship between IBP and EGJ opening and was the foundation for the development of the classification scheme utilized around the world to diagnose esophageal motor disorders: "the Chicago Classification" (CC). Despite this improved understanding focused on bolus transit dynamics, there are still significant gaps in our scientific understanding centered on the lack of a true correlate for symptoms, reliable predictive models and effective treatments for Functional dysphagia, IEM and EGJOO. Given these limitations, we have developed novel approaches that combine assessments of primary and secondary peristalsis (a NeuroMyogenic Model of esophageal function). These will leverage our recent findings supporting the importance of the esophageal response to distension in bolus clearance, noting that this response of the esophageal wall to bolus retention or reflux is one of the most essential functions of the esophagus in preventing complications of aspiration, or reflux injury. We will also include an assessment of esophageal geometry and wall biomechanics (elasticity/dilatation) as these carry essential interactions with esophageal function that are overlooked in the current diagnostic paradigms.

In order to test our hypothesis that wall mechanics are a major determinant of esophageal diseases, we had to develop new approaches and new technology to directly measure mechanical wall state, descending inhibition and LES opening. Using impedance techniques combined with manometry, we are now capable of assessing IBP and diameter changes across a space-time continuum (4D HRM). We also developed physics-based hybrid diagnostics that include a FLIP technique to assess esophageal work and power during volumetric distention (FLIP-MECH) and a fluoroscopy approach that simultaneously assesses esophageal diameter-pressure relationships (Fluoro-MECH). We also developed a new approach, Interactive FLIP Panometry, which facilitates an assessment of descending inhibition and the mechanism behind impaired LES opening. These tools will allow us to expand our models to combine an assessment of neuromyogenic function simultaneously with geometry. Our overarching goal will be to study well-defined patient populations (Functional Dysphagia, IEM/GERD, EGJOO and Achalasia) before and after targeted interventions to test the NeuroMyogenic and MechanoGeometric Model. This work will build upon the previous success of the CC and help advance the evolution of the CC by defining new, relevant biomechanical physiomarkers of disease activity that can identify new targets for therapeutic intervention and facilitate prediction of clinical outcomes.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Christine E Nelson, MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

3126952742

Dustin A Carlson, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

3129264643

Dustin A Carlson, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

John E Pandolfino, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

The proposed experiments in this application will utilize both standard of care diagnostic testing and treatment as well as research procedures in small subsets of participants as required for each Specific Aim. No randomization will be utilized in any aim. The source of the study population will be male and female subjects aged 18-85 years old inclusive and mentally capable to provide informed consent who present to the Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center with the chief complaint of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain or food impaction, or referral for treatment of achalasia, GERD, or endoscopy negative dysphagia. These subjects will be approached by the study team and provide informed consent prior to study involvement.

In Aim 1, 375 subjects (300 with FD, IEM, or EGJOO and 75 with GERD) will participate. For Aim 1a, standard of care procedural results and questionnaires will be used to develop the best thresholds that will stage the NeuroMyogenic Model. Sixty of these subjects will undergo open-label treatment with prucalopride (2mg qD (oral) for 2 weeks) with completion of questionnaires (research) after the 2 week time period. Fifteen of these (5 each stage of the Neuromyogenic model- I, II, and III) will complete a post-treatment procedure visit where they will undergo sedated FLIP with manometry and esophagram evaluation with questionnaires on the last day of medication. Sample sizes for this experiment are based on our previous results, where patients with HRM of normal motility, IEM, or AC will yield NeuroMyogenic classification of stage I in 15%, stage II in 15%, and stage III in 10% (with 60% of patients being "normal function dysphagia"), thus sample sizes of n=20 for each group will be feasible for recruitment.

For Aim 1b, we will recruit 50 subjects with IEM/FD with impaired LES Opening on FLIP and 50 with EGJOO and assess the ability of EUS-guided Botox to relieve symptoms as measured by EGJ opening before and after treatment. Additionally, a comparison group of type II achalasia (n=15) without significant dilatation (esophageal width <3cm) will be tested with Interactive FLIP Panometry (Comparison from Aim 2a). Based on our data, we anticipate 20% of 250 patients with HRM of normal motility, IEM, or AC will have abnormal EGJ opening. The response rate to distension and botulinum toxin are not a priori known for EGJOO or FD patients, thus, considering rates from 15-90%, our planned sample size of n=50 per group would provide 80% power to detect absolute differences between groups of 13-27%, which correspond to odds ratios of 3.0-6.9.

For Aim 1c, 75 subjects with GERD will undergo pH-impedance testing, HRM, FLIP and complete PROs as part of their standard of care before and after treatment (fundoplication or MSA). HRM is performed prior to the placement of the pH-Impedance catheter and the HRM procedural data along with FLIP data will be used in this experiment to attempt to predict the likelihood of dysphagia (as measured by BEDQ) after MSA or fundoplication. Assuming 25-50% of patients develop dysphagia and abnormal bolus transit occurs in 13-31% of these patients, our model would have 80% power to detect effects on the order of odds ratios of 2.6-3.3.

Aim 2 experiments focus on achalasia as the disease of interest and explore the role of abnormal geometry and esophageal wall state in determining clinical outcomes of treatment and esophageal emptying. Subjects will be studied using our clinical physiomechanical protocol (EGD, FLIP, HRM, TBE) as part of their standard of care before and 6 months after short tailored POEM. Two hundred subjects will be studied. The primary outcomes will be esophageal clearance and recoil (elasticity) in 100 subjects for experiment 2a. These data will be subject to a supervised learning method to define thresholds for defining the stages of achalasia. The planned cohort sizes (n=100) have traditionally been sufficient for fitting and evaluating SVM.

In experiment 2b, the SOC information will be collected from all 200 subjects and used to measure the primary outcome of treatment success defined as Eckart Score <3 and TBE 5-min column height <5cm (without re-intervention). We will study the success of POEM when the EGJ-Distensibility threshold is set at 3.0. Patients who fail will undergo repeat POEM to a target EGJ-DI of 6.0. We theorize that the higher stages will require a higher target for EGJ-DI. Assuming up to 10% attrition, GLM using all n=200 patients would have 80% power to detect differences in treatment response rates across up to 5 stages consistent with those rates ranging from 60-90%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The source of the study population will be male and female subjects aged 18-85 years old inclusive (females of childbearing potential should be on highly effective contraceptive methods) and mentally capable to provide informed consent who present to the Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center with the chief complaint of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain or food impaction, or referral for treatment of achalasia, GERD, scleroderma, or endoscopy negative dysphagia. All subjects must be able to undergo endoscopy with functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and transnasal intubation for 4 dimensional-High Resolution Manometry (4D HRM) and 24-hour pH impedance probe.

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently participating in a concurrent clinical trial or completed another trial within past 8 weeks.
  • Active severe esophagitis (Los Angeles esophagitis Grade C and above), Patients may be eligible once esophagitis is healed if they continue to have dysphagia in the context of healed esophagitis.

Contact PD/PI: Pandolfino, John Erik Protection of Human Subjects Page 131

  • Evidence of mechanical obstruction due to stricture (e.g., peptic/GERD patients, EoE, or other) or previous small bowel or colonic obstruction.
  • Long-segment Barrett's metaplasia.
  • Unstable medical illness with ongoing diagnostic work-up and treatment. Patients with well-controlled hypertension, diabetes and a remote history of ischemic heart disease that is deemed stable, as judged by the physician-investigator can be included. EKG will be performed before prucalopride in the 60 patients undergoing Experiment 1a.
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse or dependency.
  • Current neurologic or cognitive impairment which would make the patient an unsuitable candidate for a research trial.
  • Severe mental illness, e.g., uncontrolled major depression with suicidal ideation, active psychosis, diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Bleeding diathesis or need for anticoagulation that cannot be stopped for endoscopy.

Treatment and study plan

FLIP

Diagnostic Test

Functional Lumen Impedance Planimetry

HRM

Diagnostic Test

HIgh Resolution Manometry

Prucalopride

Other

Medication

Primary outcomes

  1. Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ)

    Time frame: baseline

    A 10 item dysphagia/food impaction questionnaire measured on a 6-point Likert scale from "none" to "severe" with higher scores indicating a greater degree of dysphagia

  2. Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ)

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    A 10 item dysphagia/food impaction questionnaire measured on a 6-point Likert scale from "none" to "severe" with higher scores indicating a greater degree of dysphagia

  3. Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) diameter

    Time frame: baseline

    Measurement of EGJ diameter in cm

  4. Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) diameter

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    Measurement of EGJ diameter in cm

  5. Esophageal Clearance

    Time frame: baseline

    Barium column height of 0 cm at 5 minutes

  6. Esophageal Clearance

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    Barium column height of 0 cm at 5 minutes

  7. recoil

    Time frame: baseline

    decrease in wall diameter >1cm

  8. recoil

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    decrease in wall diameter >1cm

  9. Timed Barium Esophagram (TBE) Column Height

    Time frame: baseline

    Height of barium column at 5 minutes (Timed Barium Esophagram)

  10. Timed Barium Esophagram (TBE) Column Height

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    Height of barium column at 5 minutes (Timed Barium Esophagram)

  11. Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP)

    Time frame: baseline

    Mean EGJ pressure for 4 seconds of relaxation in the ten-second window following deglutitive Upper Esophageal Sphincter relaxation relaxation.

  12. Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP)

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    Mean EGJ pressure for 4 seconds of relaxation in the ten-second window following deglutitive Upper Esophageal Sphincter relaxation

  13. Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility Index

    Time frame: baseline

    A measure of the distensibility of the EGJ using Functional Luminal Impedance Probe

  14. Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility Index

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    A measure of the distensibility of the EGJ using Functional Luminal Impedance Probe

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bolus Retention

    Time frame: baseline

    A combined measurement of barium column height (in cm) at 5 minutes (Timed Barium Esophagram) and Impedance Bolus Height (4D HRM)

  2. Bolus Retention

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    A combined measurement of barium column height (in cm) at 5 minutes (Timed Barium Esophagram) and Impedance Bolus Height (4D HRM)

  3. Eckhart Score

    Time frame: baseline

    A 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and Dysphagia. Scores range 0-4, lower is better.

    chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia

  4. Eckhart Score

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

    A 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and Dysphagia. Scores range 0-4, lower is better.

    chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dustin A Carlson, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

3129264643

John E Pandolfino, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

3126950182

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Collaborators

  • The California Medical Innovations Institute, Inc.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Mar 19, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.