Wake Forest Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
NCT Number: NCT04908930
Two middle school (ages 11-14) football teams will be in Aim 1 of this study. All interested athletes on these teams will be invited to voluntarily participate in biomechanical data collection; of those enrolled, 15-20 per team will be randomly selected for instrumentation with head impact sensors. In aim 3, two youth football teams at the middle school level will be recruited to pilot an intervention developed this study. The football coaches of each team will be prospectively recruited and enrolled. All interested athletes on these teams will be enrolled; of those enrolled, 15-20 per team will be randomly selected for instrumentation with head impact sensors. Baseline and post-season neurocognitive data will be collected.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me11 year–14 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
This study hypothesizes that (a) determinants at the individual (athlete), interpersonal (team & coach), and community levels (built & social environment) of the social ecological model may be identified and targeted to reduce head impact exposure in youth football practices, and (b) an evidence-based strategy to reduce head impact exposure in practices may be developed and pilot tested using a community-engaged approach.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Athletes of two new teams at the middle school level to pilot the practice structure intervention and continuously monitor on-field activity with head impact sensors to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of the practice structure
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) and quantified for practice sessions.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) and quantified for practice sessions. Number of impacts per player per minute
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) and quantified for practice sessions.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) and quantified for practice sessions.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of median linear acceleration.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of median rotational acceleration.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of median rotational velocity.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of 95th percentile linear acceleration.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of 95th percentile rotational acceleration.
Time frame: Month 3
Head impact data will be transformed to the head center of gravity using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) in terms of 95th percentile rotational velocity.
Time frame: Month 3
Perceived feasibility - higher values denote better feasibility - total range 0 - 5; 1, completely disagree; 5, completely agree - higher scores denote more possibility and agreeability to Intervention
Time frame: Month 3
total range 0 - 5 higher values denote better acceptability of the intervention (higher scores are better)
Time frame: Month 3
The intervention was prescribed to the North Carolina High School Athletic Association guidelines for contact in football practices, which limits teams to 15 minutes of live action contact per week. The percentage of practices the intervention was implemented as prescribed was monitored. An implementation score of 2 was given for adequate implementation (<15 minutes), 1 was given for partial implementation (<30 minutes), and 0 was given if live action contact exceeded 30 minutes for each practice. The percentage was calculated as the summed score for the season, divided by the maximum possible score across intervention teams.
Time frame: Month 3
Adaptations to the intervention will be tracked as the number of changes to the intervention during the football season. Coach initiated adaptions will be tracked via visual observation. Adaptations advised by the stakeholder team will be tracked via meeting notes.
Time frame: Baseline
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-1; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores. Impulse control is a measure of errors on testing and is useful in determining test validity. This score indicates the sum of errors committed during different phases of the test - 0-40; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 70-120; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 70-120; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - List Sorting Working Memory; the score range is 50-150 - higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - List Sorting Working Memory; the score range is 50-150 - higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - Picture Vocabulary - 70-120; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline and month 3
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - Picture Sequence Memory - 70-120; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - Picture Vocabulary - 70-120; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
The RAVLT assesses verbal learning ability - A series of 15 words is presented to the participant 3 times via audio recording for standardization, and answers are recorded - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-45; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
The RAVLT assesses verbal learning ability - A series of 15 words is presented to the participant 3 times via audio recording for standardization, and answers are recorded - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-45; higher scores are better
Time frame: Baseline and month 3
Participants will complete two 30-second trials (one with eyes opened, one with eyes closed) while standing on a force plate - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-50; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline and month 3
Participants will complete two 30-second trials (one with eyes opened, one with eyes closed) while standing on a force plate - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-50; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline and month 3
Participants will complete two 30-second trials (one with eyes opened, one with eyes closed) while standing on a force plate - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-10; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline and month 3
Participants will complete two 30-second trials (one with eyes opened, one with eyes closed) while standing on a force plate - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-20; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target that will be moved horizontally and vertically. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target that will be moved horizontally and vertically. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target and slowly bring it to the tip of their nose until two distinct images of the target are seen. The participant will complete this three times. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on two small targets that are horizontally aligned, moving their eyes quickly from one target to the other. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on two small targets that are horizontally aligned, moving their eyes quickly from one target to the other. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target and slowly bring it to the tip of their nose until two distinct images of the target are seen. The participant will complete this three times. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target that they are holding still while rotating their torso from side to side. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on two small targets that are vertically aligned, moving their eyes quickly from one target to the other. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on two small targets that are vertically aligned, moving their eyes quickly from one target to the other. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on one small target while rotating their head from side to side. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target that they are holding still while rotating their torso from side to side. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target and slowly bring it to the tip of their nose until two distinct images of the target are seen. The participant will complete this three times and scores will be averaged over three trials - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - Rates changes in symptoms on 0 - 15; lower scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on a small target and slowly bring it to the tip of their nose until two distinct images of the target are seen. The participant will complete this three times and scores will be averaged over three trials - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - Rates changes in symptoms on 0 - 15; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Reaction Speed; Raw reaction speed is the mean response speed for all non-perseverative responses made during the entire Test. Raw reaction speed is converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is atypically slow and <40 is atypically fast. Reaction speed is bi-directional with higher scores indicating slower reaction times (i.e., inattentiveness), and lower scores indicating faster reaction times (i.e., impulsivity)
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Omissions; Raw omissions scores are based on the number of missed targets during the test. Raw omissions scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very elevated and indicates poor performance. Higher scores indicate poorer performance
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Omissions; Raw omissions scores are based on the number of missed targets during the test. Raw omissions scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very elevated and indicates poor performance. Higher scores indicate poorer performance
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a 14-minute computerbased assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Commission; Raw commissions are incorrect responses to non-targets. Raw commissions scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very conservative and indicates much emphasis on accuracy over speed and ≤30 is very liberal and indicates much emphasis on speed over accuracy. Scores indicate the nature of participants' response style rather than performance
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a 14-minute computerbased assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Commission; Raw commissions are incorrect responses to non-targets. Raw commissions scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very conservative and indicates much emphasis on accuracy over speed and ≤30 is very liberal and indicates much emphasis on speed over accuracy. Scores indicate the nature of participants' response style rather than performance
Time frame: Baseline
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Perseverations; Raw perseverations are responses that are made in less than 100 milliseconds following a stimulus. Raw perseverations scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very elevated and indicates poor performance. Higher scores indicate poorer performance
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Perseverations; Raw perseverations are responses that are made in less than 100 milliseconds following a stimulus. Raw perseverations scores are converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is very elevated and indicates poor performance. Higher scores indicate poorer performance
Time frame: Month 3
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-1; lower scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores. Impulse control is a measure of errors on testing and is useful in determining test validity. This score indicates the sum of errors committed during different phases of the test - 0-40; lower scores are better
Time frame: Baseline
The Pattern Comparison Test is a measure of speed of processing, which typically improves steadily (time to complete task decreases) throughout childhood and adolescence, then begins to decline in adulthood, becoming much slower in older adults. As such, it is considered a "fluid ability" measure. Score range: 0-130
Time frame: Month 3
The Pattern Comparison Test is a measure of speed of processing, which typically improves steadily (time to complete task decreases) throughout childhood and adolescence, then begins to decline in adulthood, becoming much slower in older adults. As such, it is considered a "fluid ability" measure. Score range: 0-130
Time frame: Month 3
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
ImPACT is a computerized neuropsychological test battery. Participants will complete a pre-season baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - 0-100; higher scores are better
Time frame: Month 3
The participant will be asked to focus on one small target while rotating their head from side to side. The participant will report any symptoms (i.e., headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) after the task is complete. Symptoms reported range on a scale from 0-10; lower scores are better.
Time frame: Month 3
Participants will complete a 14-minute computer-based assessment that evaluates selective, sustained and divided attention, as well as impulsivity and vigilance - Participants will complete a preseason baseline assessment which will be compared to post-season assessment scores - CPT Reaction Speed; Raw reaction speed is the mean response speed for all non-perseverative responses made during the entire Test. Raw reaction speed is converted to standardized T-scores 0-90; 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. 70+ is atypically slow and <40 is atypically fast. Reaction speed is bi-directional with higher scores indicating slower reaction times (i.e., inattentiveness), and lower scores indicating faster reaction times (i.e., impulsivity).
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
Community-Engaged Sport Safety - Aim 1 and Aim 3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04837066
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Northridge, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06368050
Craniocerebral Trauma, Head Injury
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06491173
Craniocerebral Injury, Craniocerebral Trauma
Mbarara, Uganda
View Trial DetailsNCT03539848
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial Details