University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04863846
The Expect-it study aims to accompany the development and clinical implementation process of a new algorithm for the management of expected difficult intubation. The new algorithm is designed to allocate patients to specific tracheal intubation techniques. After assessing the status quo (non-algorithm-based decision-making) the new algorithm-based allocation will be compared with this clinical standard within a confirmatory diagnostic accuracy study (post-implementation).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Difficult tracheal intubation is one of the major reasons for anesthesia-related adverse events. Patients undergoing ear, nose & throat (ENT) or oral and maxillofacial (OMS) surgery often require tracheal intubation for general anesthesia but are at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Currently, existing preoperative tests for the prediction of difficult intubation show low diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, as the results of these prediction tests are not coupled with concrete treatment recommendations, they cannot be used targeted within preventive concepts. An evidence based rational algorithm for the management of expected difficult intubation has not been developed yet. It is unknown, if an algorithm-based allocation to an intubation approach might be advantageous compared with a non-algorithm-based allocation strategy.
The Expect-it study aims to accompany the development and clinical implementation process of a new algorithm for the management of expected difficult intubation. This new algorithm is designed to provide an evidence-based decision-making tool for a rational pre-choice of tracheal intubation techniques, anesthetized intubation by direct laryngoscopy (DL) or videolaryngoscopy (VL) or awake tracheal intubation (ATI). In the first study phase the status quo (clinical standard, non-algorithm-based decision-making) will be assessed (three-month period with an approximated case number of up to 600 patients). The Expect-it algorithm will be implemented thereafter. Between both study phases, the algorithm will be updated (based on the findings of the first phase), sensitivity and specificity of the clinical standard will be calculated, sample size will critically be appraised and readjusted (approximately 600 within at least three months), if appropriate. The second study phase is a confirmatory diagnostic accuracy study for the new algorithm with a single test study design, that aims to proof, if the new Expect-it algorithm is superior or at least non-inferior to the clinical standard, defined as superiority in either the specificity or sensitivity and non-inferiority in the other co-primary endpoint in each domain (ATI, DL, VL) (pre-planned preliminary analysis of the first study phase; IRB amendment 2021-10459_2-BO-ff, December 3, 2021). Sensitivity and specificity are considered co-primary endpoints. Study planning and conduction is in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) statement. The Expect-it study will further include two surveys among anesthetist in the study center in order to evaluate challenges and obstacles associated with the implementation process and possible clinical implications of the algorithm. An additional analysis will be performed to test a core data set for an 'anesthesia alert card'.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exposure of interest: clinical implementation of an algorithm
Time frame: 3 months
Clinical assessment
Time frame: 3 months
Clinical assessment
Time frame: 3 months
Clinical assessment
Time frame: 3 months
Clinical assessment
Time frame: 1 hour
Recommendation of the responsible anesthetist
Time frame: 1 hour
Recommendation of the responsible anesthetist
Time frame: 1 hour
Rating of the responsible anesthetist
Time frame: 1 hour
Rating of the responsible anesthetist
Time frame: 1 hour
Rating between -1 and 5 points
Time frame: 1 hour
Grading according to 'Percentage of Glottis Opening' (POGO)
Time frame: 1 hour
Grading according to the Cormack Lehane classification (I-IV)
Time frame: 1 hour
Percentage of successful intubations with one attempt
Time frame: 1 hour
Percentage of successful intubation without transition to another technique
Time frame: 1 hour
Total number of attempts until airway established
Time frame: 1 hour
Time to successful tracheal intubation
Time frame: 1 hour
Measured with pulse oxymetry during anesthesia induction
Time frame: 1 hour
Subjective ratings on visual analogue scales (0 to 100 with 0 being the best)
Time frame: 1 hour
Laryngospasm, bronchospasm, larynx trauma, airway trauma, soft tissue trauma, oral bleeding, edema, dental damage, corticosteroid application, accidental esophageal intubation, aspiration, hypotension or hypoxia
Time frame: 12 hours
Clinical assessment during follow-up
Time frame: 10 months
Rating of various anesthetist
Time frame: 7 months
Survey among anesthetist
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Other
Development and Implementation of an Evidence-based Clinical Algorithm for the Expected Difficult Intubation
Acronym: Expect-it
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05859542
Airway Management, Intubation, Intratracheal
Tunis, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT03599687
Airway Management, Intubation, Intratracheal
Wakefield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01718561
Airway Management, Intubation, Intratracheal
Hillerød, Capital Region, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07346768
Airway Management, Body Weight
View Trial Details