Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05791994

EVASION: Effect of VisuAl Stimulation on attentION

The main objective is to compare changes in information processing speed after 30 days of intervention in participants with a dysexecutive mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software) or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation.

Secondary objectives are:

* To compare, after 30 days of intervention, in participants with a dysexecutive MCI and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software), or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation : * changes in information processing speed of each subtest, * changes in cognitive performance, * changes in executive functions, * changes in walking performance. * To compare the quality of life, after 30 days of intervention, of participants with a dysexecutive MCI and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software) or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation. * In the "Intervention" group, to study correlations between changes in information processing speed index and the final level reached for each cognitive stimulation exercise.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Attentional abilities are among the cognitive functions that are most frequently and earliest altered during aging, particularly in the case of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. This decline can be the cause of a cognitive complaint in the patient or his relatives from the prodromal stage of the disease. This mild cognitive impairment is not sufficiently advanced to have an impact on independence and autonomy, even though recent studies have reported an early modification of walking in this population, in particular in the case of a dysexecutive MCI. The current challenge is to develop strategies to prevent cognitive decline in these patients with MCI and to avoid conversion to major neurocognitive disorders. However, while "memory workshops" are offered to patients with amnestic MCI, no strategy is clearly identified for dysexecutive MCI.

Interestingly, the integration of sensory information is modified in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, and in particular visuomotor difficulties in the early stages. Measurements of evoked potentials during visual stimulation have shown that sensory responses are preserved but cognitive responses are reduced in patients with MCI. Based on this observation, an American team recently tested the effectiveness of computer-assisted visual cognitive exercises performed regularly for 8 weeks in patients without dementia, and reported an improvement in information processing speed and walking performance. These results lead us to hypothesize that regular cognitive stimulation exercises using adapted visual exercises could improve the attentional capacities and in particular the information processing speed (=mental speed) of elderly people with a dysexecutive MCI.

A complex brain stimulation software Emeraude® has recently been developed by the Centre Régional Basse Vision in Angers from a software used for more than 30 years in people with visual impairment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment of a dysexecutive or multidomain dysexecutive nature, according to Winblad consensus criteria
  • Presence of an informal caregiver
  • Subject gave and signed informed consent to participate in the study
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of severe depressive symptoms (4-item Geriatric Depression Scale score > 2)
  • Ophthalmological or central pathology that may affect the performance of stimulation exercises
  • Regular use of psychotropic drugs that may have an impact on the performance of stimulation exercises, in the opinion of the investigator (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, neuroleptics, hypnotics)
  • Use of anticonvulsant drugs
  • Existence of a confusional syndrome
  • Participation in another simultaneous clinical trial
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person under forced psychiatric care
  • Person subject to a legal protection measure
  • Person unable to give consent

Treatment and study plan

Visual cognitive stimulation exercises

Procedure

Patients included in Intervention group will receive a 30-minute session of complex visual stimuli on a touch screen (3 10-minute exercises : saccade exercises, then pursuit exercises, then matching exercises) every other day for 30 days, with increasing difficulty of the exercises as the sessions progress.

Broadcast of a television program

Procedure

Patients included in Comparator group will watch a 30-minute television program (Allô Docteurs) on a touch screen every other day for 30 days.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in information processing speed

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Changes in information processing speed is assessed by processing speed index

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in information processing speed of each subtest

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    This outcome is assessed by Symbol Search end Coding scores

  2. Changes in cognitive performance

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    This outcome is assessed by ADAS-cog score

  3. Changes in executive functions (cognitive flexibility)

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Cognitive flexibility is measured by time needed to perform the Trail-Making Test (TMT) part B minus A

  4. Changes in executive functions (cognitive inhibition)

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Cognitive inhibition is measured by time needed to perform the interference task minus the time needed to perform the denomination task

  5. Changes in executive functions (working memory updating)

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Working memory updating is assessed by digit span test

  6. Changes in walking performance

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Changes in walking performance is assessed by changes in coefficient of variation of stride time

  7. Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days of intervention

    Quality of life is assessed by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

  8. Correlations between changes in information processing speed index and the final level reached for each cognitive stimulation exercise

    Time frame: After 30 days of intervention

    This outcome is assessed by the final level achieved for each cognitive stimulation exercise

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Marine ASFAR, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 2 41 35 47 25

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Effet d'Exercices Visuels de Stimulation Cognitive Sur Les capacités Attentionnelles Chez la Personne âgée (Etude Pilote)

Acronym: EVASION

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 30, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.