UNINPSI
Madrid, 28036, Spain
NCT Number: NCT06054061
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an integrated protocol based on cognitive behavioural therapy, positive psychology and third generation therapies is effective in improve the subjective well-being of people affected by a severe mental illness (SMI).
The design of the study is a cluster randomized control trial with two arms. Experimental groups will receive 15 sessions to enhance positive emotions, optimism, adaptive coping, finding a purpose in life and sharing it with people who are important to the user. The control group will remain on a waitlist with their treatment as usual (TAU). After the control period (15 weeks), participants of the experimental groups have the chance to receive the intervention. Both groups will be measure before and after de 15 intervention weeks. Additionally, follow-up measures of the experimental group will be taken after 3 and 6 months.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28036, Spain
This research aims to generate evidence on the usefulness of interventions focused on the well-being of people diagnosed with SMI, trying to alleviate some of the limitations found in previous protocols.
Regarding the content of the sessions, optimism, low levels of depression, social support and the degree of agreement with the therapist, have recently been identified as the factors that best predict subjective well-being in people affected by SMI. Therefore, modules on optimism and coping focused on well-being will be included, maintaining the emphasis of the work on positive emotions. By adding an individual work session in which goals and objectives are agreed upon by the therapist and user, the consensus will be strengthened between both parties. After discussing the construction of a life project throughout the protocol, the process the process will conclude with a session combined users and the special persons chosen by the participants. Both members will have the opportunity to share with each other.
Finally, we will follow the indications of recent studies which demonstrate that, in order to improve the optimistic response in psychiatric populations, it is necessary to reformulate negative thinking, practice hopeful thinking, practice gratitude and build a life project.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prior to their participation in the study, the rehabilitation team, in coordination with the research team, will assess whether the patient can benefit from the study.
Session 1: Welcome. 2: Identifying and amplifying positive emotions. 3: Experiencing positive emotions. 4: Identifying my negative "trap" thoughts. 5: Transforming my automatic thoughts into positive ones. Session 6: Experiencing my positive thoughts I. 7: Experiencing my positive thoughts II. 8: Learning to be kinder to myself. 9: Identifying a life project (Individual appointment).10: Identifying coping strategies I. 11: Identifying coping strategies II. 12: Identifying adaptive coping strategies linked to well-being. 13: Building my life purpose with my environment. 14: Helping me to build my life purpose? 15: Multi-family session, farewell and closing.
The usual treatment in the intervention of people affected by severe mental disorder in the network of public and subsidized centers in Spain consists of improving psychosocial functioning. To this end, and depending on the characteristics of the user, work is done in groups and individually on social skills, psychoeducation about the disease, adherence to pharmacological treatment, improvement of daily living activities, promotion of independent leisure, support to families in the process of relapse prevention, and training for labor market insertion.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
The scale evaluate hedonic well-being by 5 items with a 7-point Likert-type response scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree). Mean scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicates higher hedonic well being.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
The scale evaluate eudaemonic well-being by 29 items with a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6 (totally disagree - totally agree). The scale measures 6 domains of well being (self-acceptance, purpose in life, personal growth, positive relationships, autonomy and mastery of the environment). Mean scores range from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicates higher eudaemonic well being or domain.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
This scale evaluate optimism conceptualized as a positive affective state by 10 items with a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6 (totally disagree - totally agree). Mean scores range from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicates higher optimism.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
This scale evaluate the alliance with the therapist by 17 items with a Likert-type scale from 1 to 7 (never - always). Mean scores range from 1 to 7. Higher score indicates higher alliance with the therapist.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
This test evaluates psychological symptom by 45-items with a Likert-type scale from 0 to 4 (Not at all - Very much or extremely). The scale evaluates 9 domains (Depression, Hostility, Interpersonal sensitivity, Somatization, Anxiety, Psychoticism, Obsession-Compulsion, Phobic anxiety and, Paranoid ideation). Mean scores range from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates more intense symptoms.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, at the end of each of the 15 intervention sessions, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
This scale enable the monitoring of mental wellbeing in the general population and is frequently used in evaluation of projects, programs and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. The scale presented seven items, answered in a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5 (never - always or almost always). Mean scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicates higher wellbeing.
Time frame: This test is applied before starting the intervention protocol, at the end of each of the 15 intervention sessions, immediately after the end of the 15-week intervention protocol, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention protocol.
The brief form of the CORE-OM assesses psychological distress by 5 items, which present a 5-points Likert-type scale from 0 to 4 (never - always or almost always). Mean scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicates higher psychological distress.
Time frame: This record is applied by the therapist at the end of each of the 15 intervention sessions. This measure will be carried out after each treatment session assessed up to 24 months
At the end of each session, the group therapists fill out a 10-item inventory in which they indicate the fulfillment of the session's objectives using a 3-points Likert scale 0 to 2 (not achieved - partially achieved - fully achieved).
Time frame: This record is applied by the therapist at the end of each of the 15 intervention sessions. This measure will be carried out after each treatment session assessed up to 24 months
At the end of each session, the therapists record the participants who attended the session and the performance of the exercises at home before the session and in the session.
Time frame: This register is applied at the end of the 15-week intervention period.
The CSQ-8 is an 8-item measure that assessed general satisfaction with the group by a 4-points Likert-type scale from 1 to 4 (very dissatisfied - very satisfied). Mean scores range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Other
Improving Subjective Wellbeing Despite a Severe Psychiatric Condition Through "Think and Cope Positively" Program: A Randomized Control Trial.
Acronym: PA+
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05380583
Alcohol, Bipolar Disorder
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06372210
Bipolar I Disorder, Depressive Disorder
Garden Grove, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06018298
Antisocial Personality Disorder, Intellectual Disability
Bari, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04284813
Alcohol, Alcohol Use Disorder
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details