U.O.C Radiologia II Universitaria, S. Salvatore Hospital,
L’Aquila, 67100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06049563
The goal of this observational, cross-sectional, prospective study is to compare the quality of the image obtained on the upper abdomen organs with a low-field 0.4 T MRI system with the one obtained with a high-field 1.5 T MRI system, taken as a comparator and reference device.
The study is conducted on 40 consecutive adults, not vulnerable, patients who are already scheduled for diagnostic imaging examinations on the upper abdominal organs with the reference device.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
L’Aquila, 67100, Italy
The Primary endpoint of the study is to :
a) compare the image quality of the upper abdominal organs obtained with 0.4 T systems and with 1.5 T systems; This will be assessed via a noninferiority study on image quality. The image quality will be assessed by two experienced radiologists (more than 5 years' experience) and a trainee radiologist (at least 2 years) via blinded independent readings of the diagnostic images acquired both on the low-field 0.4T MRI device and on reference device e.g. the high-end 1.5T MRI device
Secondary endpoints of this study are:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MRI scan of the upper abdomen performed with the low-field 0.4T MRI system.
Time frame: On average within 7 days from intervention
Assess the image quality obtained with Low field 0.4 T MRI scan of the upper abdomen with the hig-field 1.5 T MRI scans of the same body part
Time frame: On average within 7 days from the intervention
accuracy of the measurement: diameters of gallbladder, bile and pancreatic ducts in millimeters (mm)
Time frame: On average within 7 days from the intervention
accuracy of the measurement: diameters of gallbladder, bile and pancreatic ducts will be combined to report the related volume in milliliters (cm^3)
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Data related to the comfort of the exam are collected utilizing a survey provided to the subjects entitled "Evaluation of exam comfort". The survey reports scores on a scale. For each question the subject will assign a score ranging from 1 to 5 is assigned where value 1 represents the value corresponding to the highest level of satisfaction and the value 5 to the lowest.
Esaote S.p.A.
Industry
Evaluation of Imaging Acquisition Protocol for the Upper Abdomen Scan on a Low Field MRI Scanner (0.4T) and Comparison of the Image Quality Obtained With Respect to the Conventional Examination Performed on a High Field MRI Scanner (1.5T)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06268717
Abdominal Pain, Alpha-Gal Syndrome
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07643142
Abdominal Pain, Acute Appendicitis
Istanbul, ATASEHIR, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02711800
Abdominal Pain, Anxiety
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details