Ultrasound
Diagnostic TestUltraosund of temporal, carotid and axillary arteries
NCT Number: NCT03765424
The aim of this project is to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging tools in specific giant cell arteritis disease subsets before and after treatment initiation. Diagnostic tools with high sensitivity and specificity are a prerequisite for optimal treatment of GCA patients.
Specifically, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) as compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT in new-onset, treatment naïve large vessel(LV)-GCA patients is investigated. Furthermore, long-term follow up including US, 18F-FDG PET/CT and cross sectional imaging is performed to explore the potential of imaging as monitoring and prognostic tools.
In this observational cohort, the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT after three and ten days of glucocorticoid treatment in the subset of LV-GCA patients and the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cranial artery inflammation in new-onset, treatment naïve c-GCA patients as compared to a control group of patients with a previous diagnosis of malignant melanoma was also evaluated and is registered elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03285945 and NCT03409913, respectively)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Observational
The diagnosis of GCA is clinical and syndrome-based. Only few years ago, temporal artery biopsy (TAB) was the standard diagnostic tool to confirm diagnosis, although sensitivity is moderate[3,4] and its outcome seldom affects treatment management[5]. Today, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends diagnostic imaging in all patients suspected of GCA[6]. The imaging of choice is based on the suspected vessel involvement. In patients suspected of cranial GCA (c-GCA), vascular ultrasound (US) is the recommended first line imaging test, whereas Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emissions tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is not recommended for the assessment of cranial arteries.
In patients suspected of large vessel involvement (LV-GCA), 18F-FDG PET/CT, US, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT can be used to confirm disease, but no specific priority of the imaging tests is given. US is an attractive first line imaging in LV-GCA suspected patients since it is increasingly used in the diagnosis of c-GCA, is readily available and cheap. 18F-FDG PET/CT is an appealing diagnostic tool in LV-GCA suspected patients, since it also evaluates malignancy and infection, differential diagnoses often considered in this disease subset. However, 18F-FDG PET/CT is often not readily available, is expensive and exposes patients to radiation. Moreover, its sensitivity seems to decrease with glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and the window of opportunity in which sensitivity is unaffected is unknown.
Relapse during glucocorticoid tapering is frequent in GCA. However, the evaluation of potential GCA disease activity relies on unspecific symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers. There is a significant overlap between symptoms of GCA disease activity and GC adverse effect and the same holds for symptoms and biomarkers of disease activity and infection, making the evaluation difficult. Accurate tools to support treatment decisions, avoid over-treatment without risk of GCA related complications are lacking.
The aim of this project is to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging tools in specific giant cell arteritis disease subsets before and after treatment initiation. Diagnostic tools with high sensitivity and specificity are a prerequisite for optimal treatment of GCA patients.
Specifically, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) as compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT in new-onset, treatment naïve large vessel(LV)-GCA patients is investigated. Furthermore, long-term follow up including US, 18F-FDG PET/CT and cross sectional imaging is performed to explore the potential of imaging as monitoring and prognostic tools.
In this observational cohort, the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT after three and ten days of glucocorticoid treatment in the subset of LV-GCA patients and the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cranial artery inflammation in new-onset, treatment naïve c-GCA patients as compared to a control group of patients with a previous diagnosis of malignant melanoma was also evaluated and is registered elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03285945 and NCT03409913, respectively)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ultraosund of temporal, carotid and axillary arteries
Time frame: Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment
Large vessel ultrasound for LV-GCA diagnosis is considered positive in the presence of a halo in carotid and/or axillary arteries.
Time frame: Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment
IMT measurement performed on the distal vessel wall in carotid and axillary arteries
Time frame: Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment
Vascular ultrasound for GCA diagnosis is considered positive in the presence of a halo in temporal, carotid and/or axillary arteries.
Time frame: 3 days, 10 days and 8 weeks after initiated treatment
Vascular ultrasound for GCA diagnosis is considered positive in the presence of a halo in temporal, carotid and/or axillary arteries.
Time frame: Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment
cranial artery (vertebral, maxillary and temporal) FDG uptake above surrounding tissue FDG uptake is considered consistent with vasculitis
Time frame: Time of diagnosis
Temporal artery biopsy considered positive in the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate in any vessel wall layer
Time frame: week 8, 24 and 15 months after initiated treatment
Presence or absence of halos on US
Time frame: week 8, 24 and 15 months after initiated treatment
Composite halo score
Time frame: week 8, 24 and 15 months after initiated treatment
Maximum intima media thickness (IMT) measurement on US
Time frame: 15 months after treatment is initiated
Composite PET scores (e.g.PETVAS)
Time frame: 15 months after treatment is initiated
Maximum semiquantitative FDG measures
Time frame: 15 months after treatment is initiated
Composite scores of FDG inflammatory burden (summarising FDG uptake in voxels of interest)
Time frame: 4-5 years after diagnosis
PETVAS score (summarising graded (1-4) FDG uptake in arterial vessel segments)
Time frame: 4-5 years after diagnosis
Maximum semiquantitative FDG measures
Time frame: 4-5 years after diagnosis
Composite scores of arterial FDG uptake (summarising FDG uptake in voxels of interest)
Time frame: 4-5 years after diagnosis
Aortic diameter on cross sectional imaging
Time frame: 4-5 years after diagnosis
Vessel wall thickening
Time frame: Baseline, day 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
Patients global experience of disease activity on a numerical range scale (0-10)
Time frame: Baseline, day 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
Physicians global judgement of disease activity on a numerical range scale (0-10)
Time frame: Baseline, day 3 and 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
c-reactive protein (mg/l)
Time frame: Baseline, day 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
Overall judgement of disease activity (remission, possible activity not requiring treatment, activity/relapse)
Time frame: Baseline, day 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
Cumulated glucocorticoid dose (mg)
Time frame: Baseline, day 10, week 8, 24 and 15 months
Glucocorticoid dose (mg)
Time frame: 4-5 years
Cardiovascular events (number)
University of Aarhus
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05000138
Arteritis, Autoimmune Diseases
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04554290
Arteritis, Autoimmune Diseases
Nancy, Lorraine, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03410290
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Aortic Arch Syndromes
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01795456
Aortic Arch Syndromes, Aortic Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details