Maison de santé pluridisciplinaire Léopold Ollier
Les Vans, 07140, France
NCT Number: NCT04127149
This is an interventional multi-centre study comparing two groups of general practitioners with or without an ultrasound scanner over a period of 6 months. The evaluation focuses on the management of patients for 8 pathologies:
* Pneumonia * Pleural effusion * Renal colic * Hepatic colic or cholecystitis * Subcutaneous abscess or cyst * Fracture of long bones * Intra-uterine pregnancy or extra-uterine pregnancy or miscarriage * Phlebitis The principal hypothesis is that there are fewer complementary exams in the group of doctors using ultrasound scanners.
The secondary hypotheses are:
* There is better patient orientation (emergency care, specialist consultation, return home) in the group of doctors using the ultrasound scanners. * The global cost of the care is lower in the group of doctors using the ultrasound. * Using ultrasound during the consultation decreases the anxiety of the patient. * Using ultrasound increases the duration of the consultation. * There is no difference between the predicted and the real orientation of the patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Les Vans, 07140, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The group uses an ultrasound device for the consultation.
Time frame: Two weeks after inclusion
Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know:
Time frame: Two weeks after inclusion
Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know if within the past two weeks, they have been hospitalised, required emergency care, needed to consult a specialist, or returned back home
Time frame: Four weeks after inclusion in the study
After knowing the patient orientation and the complementary exams they had, an estimation of the cost of care is made.
Time frame: Two weeks after inclusion in the study
Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know the result of the anxiety test they took the day of the first consultation.
Time frame: Two weeks after inclusion in the study
The day of the first consultation, the general practitioner writes the time spent
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Other
Pragmatic Evaluation of Ultra-portable Ultrasound for a List of Indications in General Practice
Acronym: EPEMedG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06359158
Asthma, Auscultation
Taichung, South, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT05594485
Artificial Intelligence, Atelectasis
Havířov, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT03296280
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Acute Cholecystitis
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01416519
Atelectasis, Cough
Votuporanga, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details