Evaluation of Two Different Thickening… | Clinical Trial

Key information

Conditions

Dysphagia Deglutition Disorders Digestive System Diseases Esophageal Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Pharyngeal Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University of California Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

About this study

Swallowing problems (dysphagia) are encountered frequently in primary practice and in the hospital setting. The list of possible causes is large, ranging from strokes and neurological disease to complications of cancer treatment, acid reflux, and surgery. Many patients have a reduced ability to feel food and fluid (reduced sensation) within the throat (pharynx) and this leads to an inability to manipulate food and fluids in the correct manner. This can produce a variety of swallowing problems such as choking on foods and fluids, regurgitation, aspiration, weight loss, malnutrition and poor quality of life.

Treatment of dysphagia is largely directed at rehabilitation of muscle power and education about safe swallowing techniques or positioning that limits food and fluid from entering the airway. One of the most widely accepted treatments of dysphagia is to alter the texture of food. Most patients with dysphagia will have more difficulty swallowing thin liquids. By adding a thickener to the liquid, a food bolus becomes more cohesive, and is less likely to become aspirated. Various types of thickening products are available over-the-counter without a prescription. These thickening products are bland and currently have no flavor. The investigators hypothesize that alterations in food taste (sweet, salty, etc…), viscosity will improve swallowing efficiency. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the effects of food taste, texture on swallowing efficiency. The goal is to develop safer, better tasting food products and improve the quality of life in patients with disabling swallowing disorders.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

History of dysphagia necessitating a dynamic fluoroscopic swallow study
Age > 18 years
Ability to complete a comprehensive dynamic fluoroscopic swallow study
Ability to provide informed consent for study participation

Exclusion criteria

Age < 18 years
Pregnant women
Prisoner or other institutionalized individual
Cognitive disability precluding the ability to provide informed consent or complete a comprehensive swallow study

Treatment and study plan

Thickenup

Dietary Supplement

given two 1-cc boluses of liquid contrast agent (barium), one 3-cc of thin liquid contrast, one 3-cc of paste, one cookie with contrast, one 20-cc bolus of liquid contrast, and one 20-cc bolus of thin liquid contrast. The patients are then studied in the anterior/posterior view with one 1-cc, one 3-cc, and one 20-cc bolus of thin liquid barium 1-4. At the end of the protocol patients are routinely administered products with either starch or gel based thickener to evaluate the swallowing safety of the thickened agent. The protocol includes a 3-minute limitation on total fluoroscopy time to ensure clinician and patient safety.

Other names: Liquid E-Z-Paque, E-Z-Em, Inc.

Thickenup Advance

Dietary Supplement

given two 1-cc boluses of liquid contrast agent (barium), one 3-cc of thin liquid contrast, one 3-cc of paste, one cookie with contrast, one 20-cc bolus of liquid contrast, and one 20-cc bolus of thin liquid contrast. The patients are then studied in the anterior/posterior view with one 1-cc, one 3-cc, and one 20-cc bolus of thin liquid barium 1-4. At the end of the protocol patients are routinely administered products with either starch or gel based thickener to evaluate the swallowing safety of the thickened agent. The protocol includes a 3-minute limitation on total fluoroscopy time to ensure clinician and patient safety.

Other names: Liquid E-Z Paque, E-Z-EM, Inc

Primary outcomes

Compare aspiration risk

Time frame: Time of intervention

Compare the prevalence of aspiration risk with TUA to the prevalence of aspiration risk with TU and thin liquid barium at the time the subject undergoes a fluoroscopic swallowing study

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start: 2009
Primary completion: 2011
Study completion: 2011
First posted: Jul 27, 2012
Registry last updated: May 30, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed