faculty of medicine, Suez university
Suez, 43221, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06888414
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in perimenopausal women is a common yet poorly defined condition requiring accurate diagnosis. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for evaluating intrauterine abnormalities, but 3D ultrasonography (3D US) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me40 year–55 year
Female
Observational
Suez, 43221, Egypt
Change in menstrual blood volume is a common manifestation of perimenopause, often indicative of underlying gynecological conditions. The etiology of perimenopausal bleeding is multifactorial and may include hormonal imbalances, endometrial polyps, malignancies, adenomyosis, vascular malformations, and systemic medical conditions.
The evaluation of uterine pathology can be achieved through both invasive and non-invasive diagnostic modalities. Ideally, non-invasive techniques are preferred due to their safety, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use. Ultrasonography is considered a reliable, non-invasive imaging tool for assessing uterine abnormalities and is often employed as a preliminary diagnostic step before invasive procedures such as hysteroscopy.
Among invasive techniques, hysteroscopy remains the gold standard for direct visualization of the uterine cavity. This method enables precise assessment of intrauterine pathology, facilitating accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Compared to other imaging modalities, such as hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy provides superior diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic potential.
Non-invasive diagnostic approaches, including transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) and two-dimensional transvaginal sonography (2D-TVS), are widely utilized in evaluating abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). These modalities help detect uterine lesions such as fibroids, polyps, and focal abnormalities while also assessing adnexal pathology. Three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D-US) further enhances diagnostic capabilities by allowing multiplanar reconstruction from volumetric data, improving visualization of the endometrial cavity and providing a more detailed assessment of uterine morphology.
Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography (3D-TVS) is a cost-effective, non-invasive, and highly efficient method for indirectly visualizing the endometrial cavity. Given its accessibility and diagnostic accuracy, it is recommended as a first-line imaging modality for evaluating uterine lesions in reproductive-aged women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding the optimal use of 3D transvaginal ultrasonography (3D-TVS) as a standalone tool for diagnosing intrauterine pathology. While hysteroscopy is the gold standard, further research is needed to refine the sensitivity and specificity of 3D-TVS in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, reducing the need for unnecessary invasive procedures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fifty perimenopausal women presenting with AUB were recruited from the outpatient clinic. Baseline data, including demographic, obstetric, and medical history, BMI, and laboratory investigations (CBC, renal and liver function tests, coagulation profile), were collected. All patients underwent transvaginal 3D ultrasonography and hysteroscopy.
Time frame: 3 months
Sensitivity and specificity of transvaginal ultrasound versus hysteroscopy in diagnosis perimenopausal bleeding.
Suez University
Other
Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity by 3 D Ultrasonography in Perimenopausal Bleeding in Comparison With Hysteroscopy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07465822
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified, Adenomyosis
Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07664956
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified, Adenomyosis
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07628660
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified, Endometrial Sampling
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02059954
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified, Connective Tissue Diseases
Graz, Austria
View Trial Details