Academisch ziekenhuis Maastricht
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05654675
The goal of this study is to evaluate the use of new method to quantify the amount of sugar a tumor consumes using PET/CT. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is the new quantification method superior with respect to the method currently used in the clinic? * Does the new quantification method provide accurate assessment of the sugar consumption of tumours?
Participants who will undergo a standard care FDG PET/CT scan will in additional receive a dynamic PET/CT scan prior to the standard care scan. In addition blood samples will be drawn at three time points during the examination.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
As most tumours have a high glucose consumption, important information on tumour metabolism can be obtained from PET imaging using 18F-FDG as a radioactive glucose analogue. From literature it is known that quantitative analysis improves the clinical value of 18F-FDG PET. However, instead of measuring the true tumour glucose consumption Km, in current clinical practice the 18F-FDG uptake is measured at a certain time after administration as a surrogate for Km, the so-called standardized uptake value (SUV). As the SUV suffers from a number of important shortcomings, discrepancies between Km and the SUV have been reported which may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding disease progression based on the SUV.
Alternatively, pharmacokinetic modelling approaches facilitate accurate Km assessment. Unfortunately, these approaches typically require complex mathematical modelling, lengthy dynamic PET imaging and/or invasive arterial blood sampling and are therefore not compatible to current clinical oncologic 18F-FDG PET scanning. However, from these models it can be derived that at late time points after administration Km can be approximated using a simplified approach known as the fractional uptake rate (FUR). Our hypothesis is that the correlation between the FUR and Km is superior compared to the correlation between the SUV and Km. Therefore we expect that quantification of 18F-FDG PET images based on the FUR is superior to SUV quantifications.
The results of this study may therefore lead to a new and improved method to quantify oncologic PET images which may enhance the diagnostic value of PET. In particular, this method may lead to a more accurate assessment of tumour response to therapy and may therefore prevent continuation of unsuccessful therapy or termination of a successful therapy.
Primary objective:
To investigate whether the correlation between the FUR and Km is superior compared to the correlation between the SUV and Km.
Secondary objectives:
The risks and patient discomfort associated with this scientific study are low. Only patients are included who already receive an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan as part of standard care.
Instead of resting on a standard hospital bed for one hour after 18F-FDG injection, patients will be resting inside the PET/CT system while a dynamic PET acquisition is performed.
In addition to their standard PET/CT examination, an extra low-dose attenuation CT scan will be performed resulting in an added radiation exposure of the patient of 3.6 mSv.
Moreover, three additional venous blood samples will be obtained at three time points, one before and two after 18F-FDG administration will be obtained from the patient.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Besides the standard care FDG PET/CT examination, subjects receive a dynamic whole body PET/CT examination.
Time frame: Time of PET examination
The correlation between the fractional uptake rate (FUR) and the metabolic glucose consumption (Km) will be compared to the correlation between the standardized uptake value (SUV) and Km
Time frame: Time of PET examination
Comparison between the assessment of the tumour metabolic activity as measured by the FUR vs traditional Patlak method
Time frame: Time of PET examination
The impact of the use of a patient-specific input function is investigated compared to the use of a (scaled) population-based input function on the accuracy of Km assessment using the FUR
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Other
Evaluation of the Fractional Uptake Rate (FUR) in 18F-FDG PET/CT to Assess Tumour Metabolic Activity
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01441089
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05403177
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05366881
Adnexal Diseases, Bladder Cancer
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03702309
Adnexal Diseases, BRCA1 Mutation
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details