Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills
Beverly Hills, California, 90210, United States
NCT Number: NCT03599349
Evaluate if there is a correlation between efficacy results and where the Thermal Coagulation Points (TCPs) produced during a treatment with the Ulthera System make contact with anatomical layers of the skin and underlying tissues.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beverly Hills, California, 90210, United States
This is a prospective, single-site, non-randomized study designed to evaluate if there is a correlation between efficacy results and where the Thermal Coagulation Points (TCPs), produced during treatment with the Ulthera System, make contact with the anatomical layers of skin and underlying tissues. The study consists of one Ultherapy treatment administered at two depths using DeepSEE transducers on the full-face and neck area. Ultrasound images will be captured at the beginning, middle and end of each treatment section during treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a. Bilateral tubal ligation at least six months prior to study enrollment.
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Ultherapy
Time frame: Day 90 post treatment
TCP = Thermal Coagulation Points. The average Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System (SMAS) depth in the eyebrow and lower face regions (cheeks, submental and submandibular) will be compared to quantitative measurement of lift in the eyebrow and submental/neck lift at day 90 post-treatment
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The Principal Investigator, sub-investigator or qualified clinician delegated by the principal investigator, will complete a CGAIS assessing overall aesthetic improvement at day 90 and 180 post-treatment. The CGAIS will be compared to average SMAS and average dermal thickness of the treated areas to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The subject will complete a SGAIS assessing overall aesthetic improvement at day 90 and 180 post-treatment which will be compared to average SMAS and average dermal thickness of the treated areas to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
Degree of overall aesthetic improvement determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 90 and 180 days post-treatment compared to baseline, based on level of clearance/improvement. The percent improvement will be compared to the average SMAS and average dermal thickness of the treated areas to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Level of improvement scale:
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The subject will complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire at the 90 and 180 day follow-up visits which will be compared to average SMAS and average dermal thickness of the treated areas to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The depth of the following frontal region tissue layers; dermis, subq adipose/fibrous septae, suprafrontalis fascia, frontalis muscle and subfrontalis fascia will be compared to the quantitative measurement of lift in the eyebrow region to determine if there is or is not a correlation
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The depth of the following temple region tissue layers; dermis, subq adipose/fibrous septae, SMAS and temporalis muscle will be compared to the quantitative measurements of lift in the eyebrow region to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The depth of the following cheek tissue layers; dermis, subq adipose/fibrous septae, and SMAS will be compared to the quantitative measurement of lift in the lower face regions to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Time frame: Day 90 and 180 post-treatment
The depth of the following submental tissue layers; dermis, subq adipose/fibrous septae, supraplatysmal fascia, platysma and subplatysmal fascia will be compared to the quantitative measurement of lift in the lower face regions to determine if there is or is not a correlation.
Ulthera, Inc
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03228641
Disease Attributes, Facial and Neck Skin Laxity
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01368874
Disease Attributes, Facial and Neck Skin Laxity
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06768021
Anesthesia Complication, Anesthesia Induction
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06694857
Dermal Fillers, Disease Attributes
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details