Faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo university
Cairo, 11553, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Abdelaziz Taha Malek
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthodontic Department
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06502886
The aim of this study is to compare between the stability of anterior and posterior segments in both arches using bonded lingual retainers versus a combined protocol of retention (bonded lingual retainer and vacuum formed retainers). The effect of different treatment changes achieved on the post-treatment stability will be studied in both groups.
Hypothesis: No difference between BR and BR+VFR regarding the stability of anterior segment alignment and posterior segment alignment and interdigitation
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11553, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Abdelaziz Taha Malek
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthodontic Department
CONTACT
Retention is necessary to be done after orthodontic treatment. It aids to prevent the tendency for relapse of teeth toward their pretreatment position. Fixed or removable retention appliances can reduce the risk of relapse, but to date there is still limited evidence on treatment protocols, wearing time and duration. However, long-term retention with bonded lingual retainers is commonly recommended and often considered the gold standard (method of first choice) in orthodontic retention. Regardless of the expected benefits concerning tooth stabilization, aesthetic appearance and independency from the patient's compliance, there have been increasing numbers of reports on undesirable changes in tooth position in the presence of retainers. Since "active" lingual retainers are able to exert forces to teeth, they have been suspected of causing torque changes of adjacent incisors ("X-effect"). Therefore, several authors recommend to insert removable and fixed in both arches for maximum relapse prevention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Combined bonded retainer and vacuum formed retainer
Other names: Fixed lingual retainer and vacuum formed retainer
Bonded retainer
Other names: Fixed lingual retainer
Time frame: 6 months
Using 3D models, mandibular anterior segment alignment will be measured by little irregularity index
Time frame: 6 months
Using 3D models, maxillary anterior segment alignment will be measured by little irregularity index
Cairo University
Other
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction in Adult Patients Using Bonded Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer Combined With Vacuum Formed Retainer : A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718061
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Gingival Diseases
Murcia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05733676
Cardiovascular Diseases, Caries Arrested
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06573996
Neurologic Manifestations, Orthodontic Appliance
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06944860
Class II Malocclusion, Division 1, Malocclusion
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial Details