Dentistry School - University of São Paulo
São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT02134743
The aim of this study is to compare the stability of dental implant surface treated by sandblasting abrasive particles and acid subtraction (Control) with hydrophilic surfaces dental implants (chemical) and with a higher surface energy (Test) for a period of 16 weeks after installation. The evaluation will be made by analyzing the resonance frequency (Ostell). The hypothesis to be tested will be that implants with hydrophilic surface show increased secondary stability prior to the implants treated by acid etching.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
The selected patients will be randomly divided into two groups by computer-generated list. The control group will receive implant surface treated by acid etching and test group receive implants with hydrophilic surface (Test). Both the test and the control group will undergo the same pre-surgical, surgical and post-surgical protocols.
The evaluation of the implant will be done by the analysis of resonant frequency wich will be performed on each implant with Osstell (Integration Diagnostics AB, Goteborg, Sweden) immediately after implant placement (baseline) and at follow-up sessions (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 8th, 12th and 16th weeks after installation) and coefficient of implant stability (ISQ) on these dates will be measured on a scale from 0 to 100. The smartpeg be used with special developed Healing without the use of pillars or intermediaries.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dental implant surgery with two different kinds of implant surface (SLA and modified SLA)
Other names: Neodent Neoporos (SLA surface), Neodent Acqua (Modified SLA surface)
Time frame: 4 months after surgery
If the implant has been not integrated to the bone!
Time frame: Baseline, 1 to 16 weeks (4 months)
If the implant get successively and it has been integrated to bone. The stability will be evaluated at the surgery day (T0), one week after surgery (T1),after 2 weeks (T2), after 3 weeks (T3), after 5 weeks (T4), after 8 weeks (T5), after 12 weeks (T6) and after 16 weeks (T7).
University of Sao Paulo
Other
Evaluation of the Stability of Implants With Two Different Surface Treatments: a Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05024760
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Infection
Tacoma, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03528330
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06887595
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06299449
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Complication
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
View Trial Details