Experimental- Genefill Contour®
DeviceGenefill Contour® Hyaluronic Acid Injection
NCT Number: NCT06333782
The goal of this interventional clinical investigation using Genefill Contour® CE marked device outside of its indication is to compare with other hyaluronic acid device already marketed for labia majora augmentation in women with labia majora hypotrophy/atrophy.
The primary objective is the evaluation of the safety of Genefill Contour®. The secondary objectives is effectivenes of the investigational device (improvement of patient´s symptoms, patient´s satisfaction, sexual function & pain during injection).
Participants will come to a total of 8 visits (including 2 phone calls) over a period of 12 months. Participants would be enrolled in Genefill Contour® or comparator group.
An ancillary study would be conducted in a cohort of participants evaluating the increase in volume and distance between labia after HA injection
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cabinet renaissance, Levallois-Perret, Paris, France
Prospective, Multicentric, Single Blind, Randomized study on the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of Genefill Contour versus comparator in labia majora augmentation. This study analyze the safety and efficacy of the investigational device versus comparator. Participants would be randomized 1:1 between 2 arms (Genefill Contour vs comparator). The study duration is 12 months and will consist in 8 visits (Screening visit, 5 on site visit and 2 phone calls). At week 4, an optional touch-up may be conducted. 110 participants are expected to be included in the trial.
The primary objective is the evaluation of the safety of Genefill Contour®. The secondary objectives is effectivenes of the investigational device (improvement of patient´s symptoms, patient´s satisfaction, sexual function & pain during injection).
An ancillary study would be conducted in a cohort of participants evaluating the increase in volume and distance between labia after HA injection at W4 and W12.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Genefill Contour® Hyaluronic Acid Injection
DESIRIAL®PLUS Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Time frame: During 4 weeks after injection: from Visit 1 to Visit 2 (week 4) and from Visit 2 (week 4) to week 8 only if Touch-up done at Visit 2.
Collection of ADEs by patients having received injection with Genefill Contour versus Desirial Plus after 52 weeks of use
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Effectiveness of investigational device versus comparator assessed by the investigator using GAIS.
GAIS score (1-5) as following:
1 =very much improved 2= Much improved 3=Improved 4= No change 5= Worse
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Effectiveness of investigational device versus comparator assessed by the participant using GAIS.
GAIS score (1-5) as following:
1 =very much improved 2= Much improved 3=Improved 4= No change 5= Worse
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Effectiveness of investigational device (Genefill Contour) versus comparator (Desirial Plus) on patient's symptoms.
A scale from 0 (abscent) to 10 (intolerance) of the following symptoms:
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 & Week 52
Effectiveness of investigational device Genefill Contour) versus comparator (Desirial Plus) on sexual function.
Patient will be asked about her sexual life, and the answers will be scored from 1 to 5, being 1 as the worst situation and 5 the best.
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 & Week 52
Effectiveness of investigational device (Genefill Contour) versus comparator (Desirial Plus) on patient's satisfaction.
The patient will be asked about global satisfaction of the treatment and results. The options of the answers are as follows:
Time frame: After the injection at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 ( Week 4)
Pain assessed by participant immediatly after the injection using Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) at Visit 1 and Visit 2 (only if touch-up is needed).
The rating is from 0 cm (No pain) to 10 cm(Worst pain possible)
Time frame: During the whole study, up to 52 weeks
Collection of unsolicited adverse events from screening Visit to 52 weeks after first injection.
AE severity range of grades:
0=mild
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Dalia Quwaider, PhD, MBA
CONTACT
Vanesa Garrido Estevez, PhD
CONTACT
Bioscience Cosmetics SL
Industry
Prospective, Multicentric, Single Blind, Randomized Study on the Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Genefill Contour® Versus Comparator in Labia Majora Augmentation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06962345
Dyspareunia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07024667
Vaginal Atrophy, Vulvar Atrophy
Hadera, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT05890092
Dermatoses, Female Urogenital Diseases
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07737782
Dyspareunia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial Details