Future Univeristy in Egypt
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04892056
The rate of anterior segment retraction in bi-maxillary protrusion cases was evaluated comparing the friction and friction-less mechanics. since, there has been a lack of clear cut guidelines for clinicians for the optimum method for retraction, this randomized clinical trial was done.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–25 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Thirty bi-maxillary protrusion female patients were randomly allocated into either intervention groups. In the Friction group, retraction was accomplished using elastomeric power chains extending from crimpable hooks distal to the lateral incisors, on 0.017x0.025-inch Stainless Steel wires, to the mini-screws . While in the friction-less group with retraction done using T- loop springs made of 0.017x0.025-inch titanium molybdenum wires. Retraction force was set to 160g per side in both intervention groups. Activation was done every four weeks. Rate of anterior segment retraction was evaluated via digital models.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
anterior segment retraction using elastomeric power chains
Other names: sliding mechanics
anterior segment retraction using closing loops
Other names: segmented mechanics
Time frame: The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.
The rate of anterior segment retraction per month was measured on monthly digital models.
Time frame: The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.
Mesial movement of the first primary molar was evaluated on the digital models
Time frame: The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.
Patients were asked to complete Visual Analogue Scales of the degree of pain after every intervention. The scale values between 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain experienced by the patient and 10 being the highest level of pain experienced.
Future University in Egypt
Other
Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04902430
Bimaxillary Protrusion
New Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04631419
Bimaxillary Protrusion, Dental Malocclusion
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04868721
Angle Class II, Division 1, Bimaxillary Protrusion
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05183451
Bimaxillary Protrusion
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details