Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07539194

Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of a Single-dose Hyaluronic Acid (Promovia Hydro Balance) in the Treatment of Non-traumatic Degenerative Meniscus Tears

Evaluation of the performance and safety of a single-dose hyaluronic acid (Promovia hydro balance) in the treatment of non-traumatic degenerative meniscus tears

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

35 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO

Milan, MI, Italy

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Chiara Fossati, medical doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+39 339 490 4652

About this study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a single-dose intra-articular hyaluronic acid treatment (Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg/4 mL; Innate S.r.l, Novi Ligure (AL), Italy) in restoring joint function and reducing associated pain. The safety of the treatment will also be assessed.

Primary objective: To evaluate, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at a 6-month follow-up (T6) in restoring joint function and improving associated pain in patients with non-traumatic degenerative meniscal tears.

Secondary objectives: To evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness, and patient quality of life at 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) following the injection. The safety of the treatment and the consumption of analgesics/NSAIDs will also be evaluated in the various phases of the study at the various follow-up times.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Age between 35 and 75 years at the time of administration.
  • Presence of a symptomatic degenerative meniscus tear, not related to acute trauma, documented by MRI.
  • Positive meniscal tests.
  • Pain intensity NRS ≥ 4.
  • Willingness to participate in physical therapy or light exercise.
  • Informed consent received, understood, and signed by the patient for active participation in the study and for the processing of personal data.
  • Ability of the patient to understand the study conditions and to participate for the entire duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • - Patients with traumatic meniscus tears.
  • Patients with a meniscal tear requiring surgical treatment (FLAP tear, radial tear, RAMP tear).
  • Patients with severe knee osteoarthritis.
  • Patients with axial deviation greater than 10°.
  • Patients who have undergone meniscal or ligament surgery in the previous 12 months.
  • Patients with rheumatic diseases or chondrocalcinosis.
  • Patients with signs of possible infection in the affected joint or a skin disease involving the knee (e.g., dermatitis, psoriasis).
  • Patients with diabetes.
  • Patients with coagulopathies, platelet aggregation disorders, or those receiving oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs.
  • Patients receiving intra-articular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid in the previous 12 months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.

Treatment and study plan

Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg, Hyaluronic acid sodium salt and trehalose

Device

Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg

Primary outcomes

  1. Evalution T6 with Koos (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score): efficacy

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 6 Months

    To evaluate, through the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) functional score, the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at 6 months follow-up (T6) in the recovery of joint function and improvement of associated pain in patients affected by non-traumatic degenerative meniscus lesions

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance evaluation T3 with Koos Questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months

    Evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement of general pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life 3 (T3) after infiltration treatment.

    T3 evaluation with Koos questionnaire

  2. Evaluation of performance T3 with Womac (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months

    Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life at 3 months. Evaluation with Womac scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)

  3. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in NRS at 3 month from T0

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline (T0). econdary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life

  4. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in NRS at 6 months from T0

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life

  5. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at time of 6 months.

    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months compared to baseline (T0). Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life

Other outcomes

  1. AE and SAE

    Time frame: Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0

    Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0

  2. AE and SAE

    Time frame: Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0

    Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0

  3. consumption of analgesic/fans

    Time frame: consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0

    consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0

  4. consumption of analgesic/fans

    Time frame: consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0

    consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Chiara Fossati, medical doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

i

Giulia Avio

CONTACT

[email protected]

+393925481157

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Innate srl

Industry

Collaborators

  • ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.