Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04494477

Evaluation of the Impact of the IN•Clued Curriculum: An LGBTQ Sex ed Program

The INclued program was implemented in 16 states across the US. The purpose of this study is to measure: Nine months after the end of the program and one year after the workshop, are IN•clued participants less likely to report engaging in risky sexual behavior in the past three months compared to control group participants?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Philliber Research & Evaluation

Accord, New York, 12404, United States

About this study

The IN•clued program for youth consists of a three-hour in-person workshop for youth which includes lessons about safe sex practices and self-efficacy at healthcare centers, exam room roleplays, and a discussion on patient rights. Youth receive a Zine, or a magazine-style booklet, that they may take home. They also receive a list of local healthcare providers that highlights those that have participated in the IN•clued healthcare provider workshop or have had training on working with the LGBTQ population. Program youth can also receive text messages with health tips and reminders to visit a healthcare center.

Workshops take place with LGBTQ youth groups through schools, community-based organizations, or conferences. Each segment is led by adult facilitators or trained peer educators with adult facilitator support. These peer educators are from the Planned Parenthood Teen Council peer education program. Teen Council is a unique peer education program created in 1989 by PPGNHI. It is a strong and successful peer education program that trains high school youth to become experts in delivering inclusive, comprehensive sexual health education to their peers via group and community presentations. If trained peer educators are used, they implement the intervention with the guidance and oversight of an adult facilitator.

Participants in the control condition receive a benign intervention, which like IN•clued, meets in a group setting.

Once a site or group is defined, facilitators send implementation forms to Philliber. The evaluation team reviews the information and asks any needed questions which vary by group or site. The two groups cannot differ in any significant way (e.g., gender, SES, ethnicity, or special characteristic such as pregnant and parenting participants). All decisions about final eligibility are made by the research team. If two groups or sites are similar, they are approved. If they differ in a significant way, they are not eligible for the study.

Random assignment of the groups does not technically occur until the baseline administration of the survey is completed as participants can be both added and subtracted from the group list until the time of survey administration. One facilitator at each location is informed of the outcome of random assignment before or during the administration of the baseline survey. This is done so random assignment can occur immediately after surveys are conducted as this is a one-time workshop and participants do not give assent to participate until this time.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Youth participants are already in LGBTQ groups, such as gay-straight alliances in schools or local community groups or those who are recruited to attend a special event at a community-based organization or conference. Participants must be at least 14 and preferably younger than 20. Ideally, they are part of the LGBTQ community, although this is not required.

Exclusion criteria

  • Cannot require ESL support.

Treatment and study plan

The IN•clued program

Behavioral

The INclued program as previously described.

Primary outcomes

  1. Nine months after the end of the program are IN•clued participants less likely to report engaging in risky sexual behavior in the past three months compared to control group participants?

    Time frame: One year after baseline

    If participants had recent (in the past three months) vaginal sex without a condom or birth control, recent oral sex without protection, or recent anal sex without a condom, they were coded as having engaged in recent unprotected or risky sexual behavior.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Philliber Research & Evaluation

Other

Collaborators

  • Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and Hawaiian Islands
  • The Office of Adolescent Health, HHS

Registry information

Official study title

The Evaluation of IN•Clued - Inclusive Health Care: Youth & Providers Empowered

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 31, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.