Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05547295

Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization

The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pôle Saint-Hélier

Rennes, Brittany Region, 35000, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient in complete hospitalization in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system
  • Patient presenting a low to high risk of pressure ulcer inferior or equal to or equal to 16 on the Norton scale
  • Patient having signed his consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Difficulty understanding and is unable to give free and informed consent
  • Pregnant women
  • Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative administrative decision
  • Major under legal protection by a judicial or administrative decision.
  • Person in an emergency situation unable to give their informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Numeric prevention

Other

Numeric information for prevention of pressure sores thgrough digital tool MEDIASCREEN

Paper prevention

Other

Information for prevention of pressure sores in classic way with paper

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials

    Time frame: Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month

    The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool

    Time frame: At 1 month

    Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "Not at all satisfied" and 100 : "Completely satisfied".

    Higher scores better outcome.

  2. Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem.

    Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month

    Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem.

  3. Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy.

    Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month

    Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness.

  4. Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools

    Time frame: At 1 month

    Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "No knowledge" and 100 : "Perfectly mastered subject".

    Higher scores better outcome.

  5. Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization

    Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month

    Count of the apparition number of pressure sores.

  6. Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients

    Time frame: At 1 month

    Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points.

    Higher scores better outcome.

  7. Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.

    Time frame: At 1 month

    Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3.

  8. Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.

    Time frame: At 1 month

    Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion.

  9. Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure.

    Time frame: At the beggining and at 1 month

    The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pôle Saint Hélier

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Interventional Study in Single Blind

Acronym: EDUCESCARRES

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 21, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.