Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07412132

Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Major Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder Types I and II.

Initially, observational studies suggested a possible effect of Lacosamide on depressive and anxious symptoms in individuals with epilepsy, and later, an open-label study demonstrated the efficacy of lacosamide in improving depressive and manic symptoms in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combining lacosamide as an augmentation treatment to first- or second-line medication treatments in moderate to severe major depressive episodes of treatment-resistant BD I and II (failure of at least two adequate treatments during the current episode). The main hypothesis of the study is that lacosamide produces a greater reduction in depression scores compared to a placebo treatment and that both groups will exhibit similar rates of side effects and adverse events. We will conduct a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study, comparing the enhancement of the treatment that patients had been using with lacosamide and placebo, over a duration of 12 weeks. Forty subjects aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of BD (I or II) in a moderate or severe major depressive episode, despite the use of first- or second-line treatments, will be selected. The primary outcome will be the assessment of lacosamide efficacy through the difference in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (type I or II) confirmed by structured clinical interview;
  • acute major depressive episode of moderate or severe intensity;
  • no response to at least two adequate pharmacological interventions to treat the current episode.

Exclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of schizophrenia, dementia, intellectual disability, organic mental disorder (by clinical assessment). Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders (personality disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, and attention deficit disorder) will be permitted provided the primary diagnosis is bipolar disorder;
  • acute suicidal ideation (defined by HAMD-17 item 3 ≥ 3 points or by clinical assessment);
  • current depressive episode with psychotic features (by clinical assessment);
  • suspected or confirmed pregnancy;
  • severe or unstable clinical illnesses;
  • previous history of non-response to an adequate course of at least 8 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy;
  • previous history of non-response to an adequate course of ketamine treatment.

Treatment and study plan

Lacosamide

Drug

Lacosamide 50mg will be give twice a day por 2 weeks, then Lacosamide 100mg twice a day until the end of the study.

Placebo

Drug

Placebo tablets are similar in its features to the active drug, but without any pharmacological agent inside.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    The efficacy of lacosamide assessed by the difference in Hamilton Depression Scale score from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of the intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups. Minimum: 0 point Maximum: 50 points. The increase in the pontuation of the scale is related to worse outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

  2. Secondary outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

  3. Secondary outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    Difference in remission rates (< 7 points) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

  4. Secondary outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    Difference in remission rates (<11 points) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

  5. Secondary outcome

    Time frame: week 12

    Difference in side effects from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ricardo Alberto Moreno, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 11 2661-6648

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo

Other

Collaborators

  • Libbs Farmacêutica LTDA

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Major Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder Types I and II: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Clinical Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.