Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02954640

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Sequencing Method by Gene-panel

In order to accelerate the identification of genes responsibles of PID, and to improve the diagnosis of PID, the research team would like to validate a rapid and targeted method of high-throughput sequencing, on 301 genes, known to be involved in PID.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Necker - Enfants Malades hospital

Paris, 75015, France

About this study

The Primary Immuno-Deficiencies (PID) are a set of rare diseases (estimated incidence of 1/5000). Today, more than 320 PID are described, and for 301 of them, the genetic cause has been identified, which underlines the huge diversity of all PID.

The genetic diagnosis of PID is very important for the comprehension of PID physiopathology, their treatment and the genetic patient information.

The characterisation of the clinical and immunological phenotype of patients allowed to identify a known morbid gene in 30% of cases, but for other patients, the genetic cause remains unknown, due to, inter alia, the lack of efficient tools for genetic exploration.

In this context, each year, around 600 French and foreign patients are explored at the Necker hospital CEDI (Center for Immuno-Deficiencies Explorations), for whom are identified, in 30% of cases, a known genetic cause.

Their treatment and the diagnosis of these patients is slow, partially because these studies are dependants of research fundings. In addition, in the current practice, the investigators sometimes discover incidental findings via the non-targeted high throughput genetic analyzes.

The aim of the gene-panel is to improve the diagnosis procedures of these known diseases, by generalizing a rapid and targeted method of sequencing, on 301 genes, known to be involved in PID.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient who need a genetic diagnosis of PID done at Necker's CEDI (Center for Immuno-Deficiencies Explorations), in the frame of an initial causal mutation identification
  • Patient having signed an informed consent form (or parents for minor patients)
  • Patient affiliated to National Health Care Insurance

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient refusing to participate
  • Patient under legal guardianship
  • Patient that can't fulfill the study requirements, for any geographic, social or psychic reason

Treatment and study plan

Blood sampling

Biological

Additional blood sampling for the realization of the test on the gene panel

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the 2 sequencing methods

    Time frame: 2 years

    Assess the efficacy of the identification of the genetic cause of PID, via the high throughput gene panel sequencing method, compared to the reference Sanger method, on patients with no identified mutation after analyzes done by available technics on hospital laboratories.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Imagine Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Sequencing Method by Gene-panel, Compared to the Reference Sanger Method, on Patients With Primary Immuno-deficiencies, and Who Need a Genetic Diagnosis.

Acronym: Génétique-DIH

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 3, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.