Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04186806

Evaluation of the Efficacy of 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray

The purpose of the clinical trial is to evaluate and validate the performance of the experimental mouth spray when used by persons with mild to severe dry mouth symptoms.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry

Loma Linda, California, 92350, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray to reduce symptoms of dry mouth for up to 4 hours and after 7 days of use. In addition, this study aims to support comparative claims.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Screening - Start of Wash-In Visit

  • Subject who is ≥18 years of age and complains of dry mouth
  • Only 1 subject per household is allowed into study
  • Subject with a Challacombe scale score of 1 or higher
  • Subject agrees to refrain from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to all study visits
  • Subject agrees to eat a meal prior to all study visits that include sample evaluation in the clinic
  • Subject agrees to not eat, drink, chew tobacco, chew gum, smoke, brush or floss teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject agree to not use any oral care products and any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
  • Subject agrees to only use those clinical oral care supplies provided during the entire study
  • Able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form

Water Only Evaluation Visit

  • Subject has successfully completed a ≥ 2-day wash-in period
  • Subject has Challacombe scale score of 1 or higher
  • Subject has refrained from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to the sample evaluation visits
  • Subject ate a meal prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject has not eaten, drank, chewed tobacco, chewed gum, smoked, brushed or flossed teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject has not used any oral care products, any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
  • Subject has used only those clinical oral care supplies provided during study

Baseline Period 1/Randomization Visit

  • Subject has successfully completed a ≥ 2-day wash-in period
  • Subject has a Challacombe Scale score of 1 or higher
  • Subject has refrained from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject ate a meal prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject has not eaten, drank, chewed tobacco, chewed gum, smoked, brushed or flossed teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject has not used any oral care products and any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
  • Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
  • Subject has used only those clinical oral care supplies provided during study

Exclusion criteria

Subject Exclusion Criteria for Start of Wash-In, Water Only Evaluation and Baseline Period 1 (Randomization Visit)

  • Subject has active mouth sores (e.g., cold sores, cuts, burns, canker sores)
  • Subject has a life-threatening pathological condition
  • Subject is participating in another clinical trial at the time of the study
  • Subject has profound marginal periodontal disease (purulent exudate, tooth mobility, and/or extensive alveolar bone loss)
  • Medical and oral conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise the subject's safety or interfere with the conduct and outcome of the study
  • Difficult to be compliant with recalls, such as extensive travel commitments, lack of transportation etc.

Treatment and study plan

3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray to Biotene Moisturizing Mouth Spray

Device

20 ml bottle

Biotene Moisturizing Mouth Spray to 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray

Device

44.3 ml bottle

Primary outcomes

  1. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 15 minutes post dose

    Primary endpoint will be paired-difference in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between experimental and active control product. On the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 240 minutes post dose

    Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms

  2. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  3. 10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms

  4. 10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms

  5. 10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms

  6. 10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms

  7. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  8. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  9. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  10. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  11. 10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control. The range of possible values is -10 to +10. A negative value means is a better outcome than water. A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.

  12. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  13. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  14. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  15. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  16. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  17. Response on Dry Mouth Relief

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent

  18. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  19. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  20. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  21. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  22. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  23. Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  24. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  25. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  26. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  27. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  28. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  29. Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  30. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  31. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  32. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  33. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  34. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  35. Response to Soothing in the Mouth

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  36. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  37. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  38. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  39. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  40. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 120 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

  41. Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth

    Time frame: 240 minutes

    5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Solventum US LLC

Industry

Collaborators

  • 3M

Registry information

Official study title

An Evaluation of the Efficacy of 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray on the Relief of Dry Mouth Symptoms

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 5, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 2, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.