HP828-101
DeviceTopical test article applied once daily
Other names: New device, no brand name identified-Code name is HP828-101
NCT Number: NCT00971048
To compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Trovare Clinical Research, Bakersfield, California, United States
The primary objective is to compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds, evaluated using the Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT).
The secondary objectives are comparison of the proportion of subjects with wound closure by day 22, comparison of pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and evaluation of moist wound environment as per the BWAT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Topical test article applied once daily
Other names: New device, no brand name identified-Code name is HP828-101
Hydrogel for DFU and Hydrocolloid for PU (3M Tegaderm Hydrogel for DFU; ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU); Topical test articles applied once daily
Other names: 3M Tegaderm Hydrogel for DFU, ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU
Time frame: 22 - 29 days
Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type and amount, exudate type and amount, periwound color and edema, granulation tissue, and epithelialization) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst.
Time frame: 22 days
Time frame: At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
100-mm VAS scale was used to evaluate pain, with 1 being healthy tissue (no pain) up to 100 (wound degeneration and severe pain)
Time frame: At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound exudate type and amount) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst.
Healthpoint
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02577120
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiolitis
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00011531
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07602491
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07432581
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details