OPTI-FREE® PUREMOIST® MPDS
DeviceOther names: OPTI-FREE® PureMoist™
NCT Number: NCT01684033
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) compared to Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution (MPS) in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
In this 2-period crossover study, eligible participants were randomized to either Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution or Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution in Period 1 for use with their habitual contact lenses, after which they switched to the alternate solution in Period 2. Each period was 30 days in length. A 2-day washout period during which participants refrained from using a multi-purpose contact lens solution preceded Period 1 and Period 2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: OPTI-FREE® PureMoist™
Other names: Biotrue™
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses per participant's habitual brand, prescription, and replacement schedule worn on a daily wear basis for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week for the duration of the study. During the washout period, the contact lenses were worn on a daily disposable basis.
Time frame: Day 30
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
Alcon Research
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01684046
Contact Lens Comfort, Eye Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT06758076
Eye Diseases, Hyperopia
Manchester, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06869044
Eye Diseases, Hyperopia
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07276347
Eye Diseases, Hyperopia
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
View Trial Details