Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05143203

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Self-hypnosis on Anxiety and Burnout of Nursing Staff

Its a prospective, non-interventional, single-center study, involving the human person evaluating the impact of self-hypnosis training on anxiety level and burn out in nursing and medical staff

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Centre Régional Metz-Thionville

Metz, Grand Est, 57085, France

About this study

Like other pandemics, that of Covid-19 had a significant psychological impact on the general population. However, this impact turned out to be even more acute among healthcare workers, in connection with repeated exposure to the risk of infection, the reorganization of care and their specific positioning (...) Psychotraumatic, anxiety and depression symptoms has been observed worldwide. The staff of CHR Metz-Thionville were not spared. From the first wave, the caregivers exposed directly to SARS-CoV-2 (emergency, resuscitation, cohorting sector) requested the hypnosis referent doctor of the structure, in order to benefit from hypnosis sessions in order to better manage their anxiety during the sanitary crisis.

The main demand from caregivers was learning stress management tools and a desire for empowerment without psychological support. For information, the support platform set up by the psychiatry service recorded very few calls (39 caregivers from March 24, 2020 to June 26, 2020). Faced with the influx of hypnotherapy requests, the training unit was asked to set up on-site self-hypnosis training.

It seemed important to measure the effect of this learning on the mental health of caregivers using psychometric scales.

This training was initially offered to front-line caregivers in the fight against the covid-19 pandemic and by extension to all caregivers wishing to be trained in this practice.

It is obvious that this pandemic may have worsened a general ill-being of caregivers already present before the current health crisis.

There are many studies on the management of anxiety and pain in patients with a history of chronic disease, and some have focused specifically on learning self-hypnosis techniques. Even if the protocols for learning self-hypnosis techniques are very heterogeneous in these various pathologies, there is a common observation : "studies show positive results on self-esteem, catastrophism, depression, quality of sleep , the somatizations, the anxiety of the patients (and of their parents for the children), mood ".

To date, and to our knowledge, there are no methodologically rigorous studies measuring the effects of hypnosis or self-hypnosis on the mental health of caregivers.

Publications are often limited to clinical cases or positions related to the use of hypnosis and / or self-hypnosis for the well-being of caregivers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nursing staff of the CHR Metz-Thionville: doctors, nurses or nursing assistants
  • Over 18 years old
  • Not objecting to participating in the study
  • Affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Hospital staff

  • Not speaking and/or not understanding the French language.
  • Having disorders of higher functions.
  • With known history of schizophrenia.
  • Deaf or hard of hearing.
  • already trained in hypnosis.

Treatment and study plan

Self-hypnosis training

Other

Self-hypnosis training will be conducted in two phases and the evaluation of effectiveness of the training will be measured using GAD7, PHQ9 and PROQOL questionnaires

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+6

    Time frame: 6 months after the training of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) will be measured 6 months after the start of training in self-hypnosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety disorder level evaluation D-7

    Time frame: 7 days before the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  2. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+1

    Time frame: 1 month after the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  3. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+3

    Time frame: 3 months after the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  4. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+7

    Time frame: 7 months after the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  5. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+12

    Time frame: 12 months after the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  6. Anxiety disorder level evaluation M+18

    Time frame: 18 months after the start of the training of the first group

    Generalized anxiety disorder screening scale (GAD7) The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions.

    Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

  7. Depressive disorder evaluation D-7

    Time frame: 7 days before the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 7 days before the start of self-hypnosis training.

    PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  8. Depressive disorder evaluation M+1

    Time frame: 1 month after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 1 month after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  9. Depressive disorder evaluation M+3

    Time frame: 3 months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 3 months after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  10. Depressive disorder evaluation M+6

    Time frame: 6 months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 6 months after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  11. Depressive disorder evaluation M+7

    Time frame: 7 months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 7 months after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  12. Depressive disorder evaluation M+12

    Time frame: 12 months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 12 months after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  13. Depressive disorder evaluation M+18

    Time frame: 18 months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9) will be used to measure depression disorder of nursing staff 18 months after the start of self-hypnosis training PHQ-9 is a well-validated, brief, self-reported, diagnostic, and severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care.

  14. Professional Quality of Life evaluation D-7

    Time frame: 7 days before the start of the training of the first group

    The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) is a 30 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure compassion fatigue, work satisfaction and burnout in helping professionals. Helping professionals are defined broadly, from those in health care settings, such as psychologists, nurses and doctors. It is useful for workers who perform emotional labour as well as professionals who are exposed to traumatic situations. Raw scores between 10 and 50 are presented for the three subscales (1) Compassion Satisfaction, (2) Burnout and (3) Secondary Traumatic Stress. Each score is also presented as a percentile rank comparing the respondent's scores to scores of helping professionals generally (such as psychologists, doctors, teachers and first responders). A percentile of 50 represents an average score. High scores on Compassion Satisfaction and low scores on Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress are indicative of professional health.

  15. Professional Quality of Life evaluation M+6

    Time frame: 6 Months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) is a 30 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure compassion fatigue, work satisfaction and burnout in helping professionals. Helping professionals are defined broadly, from those in health care settings, such as psychologists, nurses and doctors. It is useful for workers who perform emotional labour as well as professionals who are exposed to traumatic situations. Raw scores between 10 and 50 are presented for the three subscales (1) Compassion Satisfaction, (2) Burnout and (3) Secondary Traumatic Stress. Each score is also presented as a percentile rank comparing the respondent's scores to scores of helping professionals generally (such as psychologists, doctors, teachers and first responders). A percentile of 50 represents an average score. High scores on Compassion Satisfaction and low scores on Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress are indicative of professional health.

  16. Professional Quality of Life evaluation M+12

    Time frame: 12 Months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) is a 30 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure compassion fatigue, work satisfaction and burnout in helping professionals. Helping professionals are defined broadly, from those in health care settings, such as psychologists, nurses and doctors. It is useful for workers who perform emotional labour as well as professionals who are exposed to traumatic situations. Raw scores between 10 and 50 are presented for the three subscales (1) Compassion Satisfaction, (2) Burnout and (3) Secondary Traumatic Stress. Each score is also presented as a percentile rank comparing the respondent's scores to scores of helping professionals generally (such as psychologists, doctors, teachers and first responders). A percentile of 50 represents an average score. High scores on Compassion Satisfaction and low scores on Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress are indicative of professional health.

  17. Professional Quality of Life evaluation M+18

    Time frame: 18 Months after the start of the training of the first group

    The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) is a 30 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure compassion fatigue, work satisfaction and burnout in helping professionals. Helping professionals are defined broadly, from those in health care settings, such as psychologists, nurses and doctors. It is useful for workers who perform emotional labour as well as professionals who are exposed to traumatic situations. Raw scores between 10 and 50 are presented for the three subscales (1) Compassion Satisfaction, (2) Burnout and (3) Secondary Traumatic Stress. Each score is also presented as a percentile rank comparing the respondent's scores to scores of helping professionals generally (such as psychologists, doctors, teachers and first responders). A percentile of 50 represents an average score. High scores on Compassion Satisfaction and low scores on Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress are indicative of professional health.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville

Other

Registry information

Acronym: ESHABC

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.