Paricalcitol
DrugParicalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
Other names: ABT-358, Zemplar
NCT Number: NCT00977080
Evaluates the effectiveness of on-label Paricalcitol versus Cinacalcet with Low-Dose Vitamin D.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22311, Brno, Czechia
During a 4-week washout period, participants stopped taking cinacalcet or other vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs). (Participants who were naive to cinacalcet or VDRAs did not have to wash out). At randomization, participants entered a 28-week open-label treatment period, during which they received either cinacalcet or paricalcitol. Participants who were assigned to receive paricalcitol were dosed according to the approved label in their respective geographic regions (i.e., IV at sites in the US and Russia and oral at sites in Europe). Supplemental cinacalcet was administered to participants in the paricalcitol arms who developed hypercalcemia (defined as >= 10.5 mg/dL). The evaluation period was from Weeks 21 to 28.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
Other names: ABT-358, Zemplar
On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)
Other names: Sensipar, Mimpara, Hectorol
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value was between 150 to 300 pg/mL were counted.
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with both a baseline iPTH value and at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value showed a 30% reduction from Baseline were counted.
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with both a baseline iPTH value and at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value showed a 50% reduction from Baseline were counted.
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value was between 150 to 300 pg/mL were counted. Data from both the IV and oral strata were analyzed together.
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
Calcium values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 calcium values. Participants whose average calcium value was < 8.4 mg/dL were counted.
Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28
Calcium values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 calcium values. Participants whose average calcium value was > 10.5 mg/dL were counted.
Abbott
Industry
The IMPACT SHPT Study: Study to Evaluate the Improved Management of iPTH With Paricalcitol-centered Therapy vs. Cinacalcet Therapy With Low-dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Acronym: IMPACT SHPT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00345839
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT03626246
Avitaminosis, Bone Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03299244
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01290029
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details