Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00977080

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Paricalcitol Versus Cinacalcet With Low-Dose Vitamin D

Evaluates the effectiveness of on-label Paricalcitol versus Cinacalcet with Low-Dose Vitamin D.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

During a 4-week washout period, participants stopped taking cinacalcet or other vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs). (Participants who were naive to cinacalcet or VDRAs did not have to wash out). At randomization, participants entered a 28-week open-label treatment period, during which they received either cinacalcet or paricalcitol. Participants who were assigned to receive paricalcitol were dosed according to the approved label in their respective geographic regions (i.e., IV at sites in the US and Russia and oral at sites in Europe). Supplemental cinacalcet was administered to participants in the paricalcitol arms who developed hypercalcemia (defined as >= 10.5 mg/dL). The evaluation period was from Weeks 21 to 28.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients >= 18 years old.
  • Patient was diagnosed with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and had been receiving intravenous (IV) or oral vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) or cinacalcet during the 8 weeks prior to the screening period or naïve patients who had not received VDRA or cinacalcet within 8 weeks of screening.
  • Patient was on maintenance HD (hemodialysis) 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months prior to screening and was expected to remain on HD for the duration of the study.
  • For entry into the Pre-Treatment Washout Period (for patients who were not naïve to VDRAs and cinacalcet), the patient had to have screening laboratory values of:
  • iPTH level 130 to 700 pg/mL
  • Serum Total Alkaline Phosphatase level >= 40 U/L
  • Calcium level <= 10.0 mg/dL (2.49 mmol/L)
  • Calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP) <= 75 mg2/dL2 (US) and <= 70 mg2/dL2 (non-US)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient had a history of parathyroidectomy.
  • Patient had a current malignancy (with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), or clinically significant liver disease, in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Use of known inhibitors (i.e., ketoconazole) or inducers (i.e., carbamazepine) of cytochrome P450 (including grapefruit and/or grapefruit juice) 3A (CYP3A) or drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) (e.g., flecainide, vinblastine, thioridazine, and most tricyclic antidepressants) within 2 weeks prior to study drug administration. Commonly used beta blockers such as metoprolol and carvedilol are allowed but are metabolized by CYP2D6; thus, an adjustment to a lower dose may have been required.
  • Patient was known to be human immunodeficiency (HIV) positive.

Treatment and study plan

Paricalcitol

Drug

Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)

Other names: ABT-358, Zemplar

Cinacalcet

Drug

On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)

Other names: Sensipar, Mimpara, Hectorol

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants Who Achieve a Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) Value Between 150 to 300 pg/mL During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value was between 150 to 300 pg/mL were counted.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieve at Least 30% Reduction From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) as Assessed by the Mean iPTH Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with both a baseline iPTH value and at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value showed a 30% reduction from Baseline were counted.

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieve at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in iPTH as Assessed by the Mean iPTH Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with both a baseline iPTH value and at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value showed a 50% reduction from Baseline were counted.

  3. Analysis of the Number of Participants Who Achieve a Mean iPTH Value Between 150 and 300 pg/mL During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28) Using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test Controlling for IV and Oral Site Randomization Strata

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value was between 150 to 300 pg/mL were counted. Data from both the IV and oral strata were analyzed together.

  4. Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Defined as < 8.4 mg/dL and Based on the Mean of at Least 2 Values Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28)

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    Calcium values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 calcium values. Participants whose average calcium value was < 8.4 mg/dL were counted.

  5. Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia Defined as Calcium > 10.5 mg/dL and Based on the Mean of at Least 2 Values Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28)

    Time frame: Weeks 21 to 28

    Calcium values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 calcium values. Participants whose average calcium value was > 10.5 mg/dL were counted.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Abbott

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The IMPACT SHPT Study: Study to Evaluate the Improved Management of iPTH With Paricalcitol-centered Therapy vs. Cinacalcet Therapy With Low-dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Acronym: IMPACT SHPT

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Sep 15, 2009
Registry last updated
Jun 20, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.