Ultherapy treatment
DeviceFocused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
NCT Number: NCT04795622
1. Demonstrate superiority of treatment with the Ulthera DeepSEE System compared to untreated control for the improvement of skin laxity of the lower face and submental area. 2. Demonstrate the safety of treatment with the Ulthera DeepSEE System for the improvement of skin laxity of the lower face and submental area.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Air Force General Hospital, Merz Investigational Site #0860002, Beijing, China
Subjects in the study received a single treatment with Ulthera DeepSEE system on the midface, lower face, submental (under the chin) and upper neck area using 3 DeepSEE (DS) transducers (DS 10-1.5, DS 7-3.0, DS 7-4.5) at either Day 1 or Day 90. Subjects treated at Day 1 were followed for 180 days after treatment and subjects treated at Day 90 were followed for 90 days after treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
Untreated-control, followed by Ultherapy treatment (focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin)
Time frame: Day 90
Lower face and submental skin laxity were determined by three blinded evaluators after comparing Day 90 photographs with baseline photographs. Improvement was concluded if at least two evaluators assessed the Day 90 photographs as "improved" compared to baseline.
Time frame: Day 90
Displacement of skin (in millimeters [mm]) in the submentum was determined by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative photographic analysis by comparing Day 90 photographs with baseline photographs. X-axis (lateral), Y-axis (vertical), and Z-axis (anterior to posterior) direction components were provided for both sides of the face combined (that is, overall).
Time frame: Day 90
iGAIS ratings (-3 to +3 scores; lower scores meant worse outcome) used baseline photographs for comparison. Improvement was defined as a rating of +1, +2, or +3 on the iGAIS.
Time frame: Day 90
sGAIS ratings (-3 to +3 scores; lower scores meant worse outcome) used baseline photographs for comparison. Improvement was defined as a rating of +1, +2, or +3 on the sGAIS.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 90
The subject assessed satisfaction using the Face-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline module (1 [very dissatisfied] to 4 [very satisfied] scores; Rasch transformed score 0-100; higher scores meant better outcome).
Time frame: From first treatment (Day 1) up to end of the study (EOS) (Up to Day 180)
Merz North America, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.