Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07332026

Evaluation of the Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Success of Adult Pulpotomy

The aim of the present study will be directed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of adult pulpotomies in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Moataz A AlKhawas

Cairo, 11651, Egypt

About this study

Out of one hundred patients, Seventy Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic at the faculty of dental medicine Al-Azhar University to take part in this study. Diabetic and non diabetic patients aged between 30 and 65 years complaining of irreversible pulpitis related to the lower permanent first or second molar tooth . All patients were clinically reexamined and radiographically assessed using a periapical radiograph.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

lower first or second molar diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

Treatment and study plan

Pulpotomy

Procedure

complete excision of coronal pulp

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome assessment

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

    Assessment of outcome was done using the technique described by Zanini et al. Each patient was evaluated at different time intervals;

    Treatment was considered successful if there was an intact final restoration, an asymptomatic tooth, and the periapical index score was 1.

    Treatment was considered Uncertain if the final restoration is intact, asymptomatic tooth, and the periapical index score of 2.

    Treatment was considered a failure if there was not an intact final restoration, irrelevant clinical symptoms and an irrelevant periapical index score.

    Treatment was considered a failure if there was an intact final restoration with symptoms and an irrelevant periapical index score.

    • Treatment was considered a failure if there was an intact final restoration, irrelevant clinical symptoms, and the periapical index was 3 or more.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Other

Registry information

Acronym: controlled cli

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.