Clairval Private Hospital
Marseille, Paca, 13009, France
NCT Number: NCT04134975
Investigators team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. We will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Marseille, Paca, 13009, France
The use of pedicle screws in spinal surgery has seen a major advance in recent decades, allowing for greater biomechanical stability and higher fusion rates. In order to avoid any malposition that could cause neurological, vascular and visceral injuries and compromise this mechanical stability, imaging-guided surgical techniques have been developed. These are aimed at improving the positioning accuracy of pedicle screws to reduce these risks and improve mechanical stability and intervertebral fusion. Fluoroscopic examinations had long been the mainstay of intraoperative control imaging until the development of computer-assisted techniques. However, despite intraoperative examination, pedicle screw misalignment remains very common and even experienced surgeons can deviate screws in 5 to 20% of cases when using a standard fluoroscopic examination image. Thus, navigation techniques coupled with an intraoperative scanner, involving the acquisition of 2D images of the surgical field, have been developed. These techniques allow the neurosurgeon to navigate the spine and thus allow an improvement in the positioning accuracy of the pedicle screws. The correlate is an improvement of the safety of the procedure (reduction of complications) but also an optimisation of the biomechanical efficiency of the osteosynthesis.
With respect to the radiation emitted during navigated spinal surgery coupled with an intraoperative scan, some comparative studies have shown that the radiation rates received by the neurosurgical team and the patient were lower than the radiation rates received in conventional surgery. To date, few studies combining the analysis of the pedicular screw accuracy rate and the radiation rate transmitted to the neurosurgical team and patients have been published.
Therefore the team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning (BODYTom, Samsung) coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. The investigator team will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
surgery with pedicle screw placement between L1 and S1
Time frame: 48 hours
The accuracy of pedicle screw positioning will be evaluated on the early postoperative examination scan (within 48 hours after the intervention) and graded according to the following classification:
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
Other
Evaluation of the Contribution of Intraoperative Scans Coupled With the Navigation for the Precision of the Positioning of the Pedicle Screws During a Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Study ScanRach Study
Acronym: SCANRACH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06989632
Bone Diseases, Hernia
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07454304
Bone Diseases, Hernia
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07268885
Back Pain, Facet Joint Arthritis
Ramallah, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT04984213
Intervertebral disc disease, Lumbar Disc Disease
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
View Trial Details