Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03960567

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the POGO Score

A classification method describing the larynx appearance during laryngoscopy accepted by all anesthetists has not been defined yet. In one study, it was shown that anesthetists mis classed the glottis image by 50%. The most commonly used classification method is the Cormack Lehane (CL) classification. This classification classifies the larynx appearance during direct laryngoscopy form 1 to 4. The modified CL classification is criticized as it does not predict difficult intubation and especially grade 2 is operator dependent and partial view is not well defined. The numerical expression of the percentage of the glottic aperture (POGO = percentile of glottic opening) is another score. In this score, A POGO score of 100% accounts for full visualization of the larynx starting from anterior commissure to the posterior cartilage, while 0% indicated a complete absence of glottic opening.

The use of a standard and effective classification method will facilitate and accelerate communication between anesthetists in difficult life-threatening situations such as difficult airway / difficult intubation / difficult ventilation and contribute to patient safety. The use of common terminology can also facilitate the evaluation of the performance of intubation tools.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and intra and inter rater reliability of the POGO score.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Dilek Ünal

Ankara, 06300, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Anesthesiologist will be asked to score still images of laryngeal views, which will be obtained from patients requiring intubation for general anesthesia, after obtaining written informed consent.

The images of the larynx will be captured first with the Macintosh blade and thereafter with the D blade. A group of independent anesthesiologist will score these images with the Cormack Lehane and POGO scores. The set of images will be prepared from patients with both difficult and normal airway anatomy. Some images in the series will be repeated to assess intra rater variability.

The anesthesiologist will be asked to rate 20 images both with the CL and POGO scores.

The experience of the raters in airway management, their experience with videolaryngoscopy and scoring systems used currently when documenting videolaryngoscopy and demographic data will be also obtained.

The POGO scores of the participants and investigators will be compared.

The outcome of interest is the correct POGO score rate of the participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients receiving general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Emergency surgery

Treatment and study plan

videolaryngoscopy

Device

Patient will be intubated by using videolaryngoscope

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentile of glottic opening

    Time frame: 2 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    A percentile of glottic opening score of 100% accounts for full visualization of the larynx starting from anterior commissure to the posterior cartilage, while 0% indicated a complete absence of glottic opening.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Accuracy and the Intra and Inter Rater Reliability of the POGO Score

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 23, 2019
Registry last updated
Dec 27, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.