Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01947868

Evaluation of Symptoms Improvement in NSCLC Patients With First-Line Therapy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

This is an open-label, non-interventional, single-arm, multicenter study in a real-world population to assess the clinically symptom improvement and quality of life (QoL) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and positive EGFR mutation who receive EGFR-TKIs as the first-line treatment.

The Primary Objective is to estimate symptom improvement rates in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and positive EGFR mutation who receive EGFR-TKIs as the first-line treatment. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as an increase from baseline of 2 or more points for LCS (Lung Cancer Scales) at Week 4.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–130 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

China Medical University Hospital

Taichung, Taiwan

About this study

The Secondary Objectives are:

  • To estimate symptom improvement rates at weeks 2 and 12
  • To estimate mean change from baseline in overall QoL scores using the FACT-L instrument and LCS score at Week 2, 4 and 12.
  • To estimate the proportion of patients exhibiting an LCS change of 7 points or more at weeks 2, 4 and 12.
  • Subgroup information of symptom improvement rate, QoL and disease-related symptom scores by gender, smoking status, smoking pattern, WHO performance, number of metastatic sites, female/never smokers and patients with COPD at week 2, week 4 and week 12.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIb/IV) NSCLC.
  • Patients who are positive for EGFR mutation
  • Patients with a prescription of EGFR-TKI as their first-line treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Involvement in any planning and/or conduct of the clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of patients demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement post 4 weeks of EGFR-TKI therapy defined as an increase in LCS ≥ 2 points from baseline.

    Time frame: 15 months

    LCS is Lung Cancer Scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of patients demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement post 2 weeks and 12 weeks of EGFR-TKI therapy as defined as an increase in LCS ≥ 2 points from baseline.

    Time frame: 15 months

  2. Mean change from baseline to Week 2, 4 and 12 in FACT-L, TOI and LCS.

    Time frame: 15 months

    FACT-L is Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire. TOI is Treatment Outcome Index. LCS is Lung Cancer Scale.

  3. The proportion of patients demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement post 2, 4 and 12 weeks of EGFR-TKI therapy as defined as an increase in LCS ≥ 7 points from baseline.

    Time frame: 15 months

    LCS is Lung Cancer Scale

  4. Descriptive statistics in improvement rate (defined as LCS ≥ 2 points changed from baseline), QoL and disease-related symptom scores at week 2,4 and 12 and summarized by gender, smoking status, smoking pattern, WHO performance status, etc

    Time frame: 15 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Non-interventional Evaluation of Symptoms Improvement of First-Line Therapy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Advanced NSCLC Patients With Positive EGFR Mutation - the SMILE Study

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 23, 2013
Registry last updated
Sep 23, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.